Suppr超能文献

不同泌尿外科实践中指南一致的主动监测随访的差异。

Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology Practices.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Urology, William Beaumont Hospital (SK), Royal Oak, Michigan.

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Urology, William Beaumont Hospital (SK), Royal Oak, Michigan.

出版信息

J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.071. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We examined the frequency of followup prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy among men treated with active surveillance in the academic and community urology practices comprising MUSIC (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MUSIC is a consortium of 42 practices that maintains a prospective clinical registry with validated clinical data on all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at participating sites. We identified all patients in MUSIC practices who entered active surveillance and had at least 2 years of continuous followup. After determining the frequency of repeat prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy, we calculated rates of concordance with NCCN Guidelines® recommendations (ie at least 3 prostate specific antigen tests and 1 surveillance biopsy) collaborative-wide and across individual practices.

RESULTS

We identified 513 patients who entered active surveillance from January 2012 through September 2013 and had at least 2 years of followup. Among the 431 men (84%) who remained on active surveillance for 2 years 132 (30.6%) underwent followup surveillance testing at a frequency that was concordant with NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) recommendations. At the practice level, the median rate of guideline concordant followup was 26.5% (range 10% to 67.5%, p <0.001). Among patients with discordant followup, the absence of followup biopsy was common and not significantly different across practices (median rate 82.0%, p = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Among diverse community and academic practices in Michigan, there is wide variation in the proportion of men on active surveillance who meet guideline recommendations for followup prostate specific antigen testing and repeat biopsy. These data highlight the need for standardized active surveillance pathways that emphasize the role of repeat surveillance biopsies.

摘要

目的

我们检查了在包括 MUSIC(密歇根泌尿外科学改进合作组织)在内的学术和社区泌尿科实践中接受主动监测治疗的男性进行后续前列腺特异性抗原检测和前列腺活检的频率。

材料与方法

MUSIC 是一个由 42 个实践组成的联盟,它维护着一个前瞻性临床登记处,其中包含参与站点所有诊断为前列腺癌患者的经过验证的临床数据。我们确定了 MUSIC 实践中所有进入主动监测且至少有 2 年连续随访的患者。在确定重复前列腺特异性抗原检测和前列腺活检的频率后,我们计算了与 NCCN 指南®推荐(即至少 3 次前列腺特异性抗原检测和 1 次监测活检)的一致性率,包括整个合作范围内和各个实践中的一致性率。

结果

我们确定了 2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 9 月期间进入主动监测且至少有 2 年随访的 513 名患者。在 431 名(84%)至少 2 年接受主动监测的男性中,132 名(30.6%)的随访监测检测频率与 NCCN®(国家综合癌症网络®)建议一致。在实践层面,符合指南的随访中位率为 26.5%(范围为 10%至 67.5%,p<0.001)。在随访结果不一致的患者中,未进行随访活检的情况很常见,但不同实践之间无显著差异(中位率为 82.0%,p=0.35)。

结论

在密歇根州的不同社区和学术实践中,接受主动监测的男性中符合后续前列腺特异性抗原检测和重复活检指南建议的比例存在很大差异。这些数据突出表明需要制定标准化的主动监测途径,强调重复监测活检的作用。

相似文献

1
Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology Practices.
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.071. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
2
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
3
Active Surveillance as Initial Management of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: Data from the PURC.
J Urol. 2019 May;201(5):929-936. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.018.
4
Understanding the Performance of Active Surveillance Selection Criteria in Diverse Urology Practices.
J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Follow-up in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Strict Protocol Adherence Remains Important for PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Sep;2(5):483-489. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
6
Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.
J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):600-608. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002734. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
Repeat Prostate Biopsy Practice Patterns in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3338. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Concordance of confirmatory prostate biopsy in active surveillance with national guidelines: An analysis from the multi-institutional PURC cohort.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Nov;38(11):846.e17-846.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators for Shared Decision Making Across Diverse Urology Practices in Michigan.
Urology. 2017 Jun;104:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.039. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Patient Experience During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
J Patient Exp. 2025 Aug 18;12:23743735251369557. doi: 10.1177/23743735251369557. eCollection 2025.
2
Is uptake of AS in low-risk prostate cancer in Ontario linked to guideline publication?
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Jun;19(6):165-166. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.9282.
5
Use of expectant management based on prostate cancer risk and health status: How far are we from a risk-adapted approach?
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jul;41(7):323.e17-323.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 5.
6
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Past, Current, and Future Trends.
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):629. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040629.
7
A vision for closing the evidence-practice gap in the management of low-grade prostate cancer.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Mar 1;7(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad028.
8
Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439.
10
Primary Care Physician Perspectives on Low Risk Prostate Cancer Management: Results of a National Survey.
Urol Pract. 2021 Jul;8(4):515-522. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000231. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0004.
3
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2015.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Dec;13(12):1534-61. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0181.
4
Factors Influencing Selection of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Urology. 2015 Nov;86(5):901-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
5
Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6036.
7
A Statewide Intervention to Reduce Hospitalizations after Prostate Biopsy.
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.126. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验