Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Urology, William Beaumont Hospital (SK), Royal Oak, Michigan.
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Urology, William Beaumont Hospital (SK), Royal Oak, Michigan.
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.071. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
We examined the frequency of followup prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy among men treated with active surveillance in the academic and community urology practices comprising MUSIC (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative).
MUSIC is a consortium of 42 practices that maintains a prospective clinical registry with validated clinical data on all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at participating sites. We identified all patients in MUSIC practices who entered active surveillance and had at least 2 years of continuous followup. After determining the frequency of repeat prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy, we calculated rates of concordance with NCCN Guidelines® recommendations (ie at least 3 prostate specific antigen tests and 1 surveillance biopsy) collaborative-wide and across individual practices.
We identified 513 patients who entered active surveillance from January 2012 through September 2013 and had at least 2 years of followup. Among the 431 men (84%) who remained on active surveillance for 2 years 132 (30.6%) underwent followup surveillance testing at a frequency that was concordant with NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) recommendations. At the practice level, the median rate of guideline concordant followup was 26.5% (range 10% to 67.5%, p <0.001). Among patients with discordant followup, the absence of followup biopsy was common and not significantly different across practices (median rate 82.0%, p = 0.35).
Among diverse community and academic practices in Michigan, there is wide variation in the proportion of men on active surveillance who meet guideline recommendations for followup prostate specific antigen testing and repeat biopsy. These data highlight the need for standardized active surveillance pathways that emphasize the role of repeat surveillance biopsies.
我们检查了在包括 MUSIC(密歇根泌尿外科学改进合作组织)在内的学术和社区泌尿科实践中接受主动监测治疗的男性进行后续前列腺特异性抗原检测和前列腺活检的频率。
MUSIC 是一个由 42 个实践组成的联盟,它维护着一个前瞻性临床登记处,其中包含参与站点所有诊断为前列腺癌患者的经过验证的临床数据。我们确定了 MUSIC 实践中所有进入主动监测且至少有 2 年连续随访的患者。在确定重复前列腺特异性抗原检测和前列腺活检的频率后,我们计算了与 NCCN 指南®推荐(即至少 3 次前列腺特异性抗原检测和 1 次监测活检)的一致性率,包括整个合作范围内和各个实践中的一致性率。
我们确定了 2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 9 月期间进入主动监测且至少有 2 年随访的 513 名患者。在 431 名(84%)至少 2 年接受主动监测的男性中,132 名(30.6%)的随访监测检测频率与 NCCN®(国家综合癌症网络®)建议一致。在实践层面,符合指南的随访中位率为 26.5%(范围为 10%至 67.5%,p<0.001)。在随访结果不一致的患者中,未进行随访活检的情况很常见,但不同实践之间无显著差异(中位率为 82.0%,p=0.35)。
在密歇根州的不同社区和学术实践中,接受主动监测的男性中符合后续前列腺特异性抗原检测和重复活检指南建议的比例存在很大差异。这些数据突出表明需要制定标准化的主动监测途径,强调重复监测活检的作用。