Suppr超能文献

德国有姑息治疗需求的居家护理患者使用痛苦温度计的准确性。

Accuracy of the Distress Thermometer for home care patients with palliative care needs in Germany.

作者信息

Wüller Johannes, Küttner Stefanie, Foldenauer Ann Christina, Rolke Roman, Pastrana Tania

机构信息

Home Care Städteregion Aachen,Aachen,Germany.

Department of Hematology and Internal Oncology,Hospital of Düren,Düren,Germany.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2017 Jun;15(3):288-294. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000699. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine the accuracy of the German version of the Distress Thermometer (DT) compared with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in patients with palliative care needs living at home.

METHOD

Ours was a 15-month cross-sectional study beginning in September of 2013 in Germany with consecutive patients cared for by a palliative home care service. The survey was implemented during the initial visit by a home care team. Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years of age, mentally or physically unable to complete the assessment questionnaires as judged by their healthcare worker, or unable to understand the German language. During the first encounter, the DT and HADS were applied, and sociodemographic and medical data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 89 persons completed both the HADS and DT questionnaires (response rate = 59.7%; mean age = 67 years; female = 55.1%; married = 65.2%; living home with relatives = 73.0%; oncological condition = 92.1%; Karnofsky Performance Scale [KPS] score: 0-40 = 30.3%, 50-70 = 57.3%, >80 = 6.7%). The mean DT score was 6.3 (±2.3), with 84.3% of participants scoring above the DT cutoff (≥4). The mean HADStotal score was 17.9 (±7.8), where 64% of participants had a total HADS score (HADStotal) ≥15, 51.7% reported anxiety (HADSanxiety ≥ 8), and 73% reported depression (HADSdepression ≥ 8). Using the HADS as a gold standard, a DT cutoff score ≥5 was optimal for identifying severe distress in patients with palliative care needs, with a sensitivity of 93.0%, a specificity of 34.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.3%, and likelihood ratios LR+ = 1.42 (<3) and -LR = 0.203 (<0.3).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The DT performed satisfactorily compared to the HADS in screening for distress in our study and can be employed as an instrument for identification of patients with distress. Consequent to the high prevalence of distress, we recommend its routine use for screening distressed persons at home with palliative care needs in order to offer adequate support.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是在居家的姑息治疗需求患者中,比较德语版痛苦温度计(DT)与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)的准确性。

方法

这是一项为期15个月的横断面研究,于2013年9月在德国开展,研究对象为接受姑息家庭护理服务的连续患者。该调查在家庭护理团队的首次访视期间进行。如果患者年龄在18岁以下、医护人员判断其精神或身体上无法完成评估问卷或无法理解德语,则将其排除。在首次接触时,应用DT和HADS,并收集社会人口统计学和医学数据。

结果

共有89人完成了HADS和DT问卷(应答率=59.7%;平均年龄=67岁;女性=55.1%;已婚=65.2%;与亲属同住家中=73.0%;肿瘤疾病=92.1%;卡氏功能状态量表[KPS]评分:0 - 40=30.3%,50 - 70=57.3%,>80=6.7%)。DT平均得分为6.3(±2.3),84.3%的参与者得分高于DT临界值(≥4)。HADS总分平均为17.9(±7.8),其中64%的参与者HADS总分(HADStotal)≥15,51.7%报告有焦虑(HADSanxiety≥8),73%报告有抑郁(HADSdepression≥8)。以HADS作为金标准,DT临界值≥5最适合识别有姑息治疗需求患者的严重痛苦,灵敏度为93.0%,特异度为34.4%,阳性预测值(PPV)为73.3%,似然比LR +=1.42(<3)和 - LR =0.203(<0.3)。

结果的意义

在我们的研究中,DT与HADS相比在筛查痛苦方面表现令人满意,可作为识别痛苦患者的工具。鉴于痛苦的高患病率,我们建议常规使用它来筛查有姑息治疗需求的居家痛苦患者,以便提供充分的支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验