Suppr超能文献

心脏辅助装置HeartWare左心室辅助装置非体外循环与体外循环植入的短期经验

Short-Term Experience with Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Implantation of the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device.

作者信息

Gregoric Igor D, Radovancevic Rajko, Akay Mehmet H, Jezovnik Mateja K, Nathan Sriram, Patel Manish, Patel Jayeshkumar A, Nedelcu Elena, Nguyen Nghia D, Loyalka Pranav, Kar Biswajit

机构信息

From the Center for Advanced Heart Failure, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston/Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2017 Jan/Feb;63(1):68-72. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000448.

Abstract

Implantation of left ventricular assist devices while avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may decrease bleeding and improve postoperative recovery. To understand the effectiveness of this approach, we reviewed the charts of 26 patients who underwent HeartWare left ventricular assist device (HVAD) implantation without use of CPB (off-CPB group) and 22 patients who had HVAD implanted with CPB (CPB group) with an emphasis on the 30 day postoperative period. Preoperatively, both groups had similar demographic, functional, and hemodynamic characteristics. Off-CPB patients had significantly shorter surgery times than CPB patients, 188.5 (161.5-213.3) min versus 265.0 (247.5-299.5) min, respectively; p < 0.001. Blood transfusion requirements during surgery and within the postoperative 48 hour period were significantly lower in the off-CPB group than in the CPB group (odds ratio: 5.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-31.1, p = 0.042). Compared with the CPB group, the off-CPB group patients had a shorter intubation time, 21 (17.4-48.5) hours versus 41 (20.6-258.4) hours; p = 0.042. Intensive care unit stay was 7.0 (4.75-13.5) days for off-CPB versus 10.0 (6.0-19.0) days for CPB (p = 0.256). The off-CPB approach allows HVAD to be implanted quickly with significantly less perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements and facilitates postoperative rehabilitation.

摘要

在避免使用体外循环(CPB)的情况下植入左心室辅助装置可能会减少出血并改善术后恢复。为了解这种方法的有效性,我们回顾了26例未使用CPB植入HeartWare左心室辅助装置(HVAD)的患者(非CPB组)和22例使用CPB植入HVAD的患者(CPB组)的病历,重点关注术后30天。术前,两组患者在人口统计学、功能和血流动力学特征方面相似。非CPB组患者的手术时间明显短于CPB组患者,分别为188.5(161.5 - 213.3)分钟和265.0(247.5 - 299.5)分钟;p < 0.001。非CPB组在手术期间和术后48小时内的输血需求明显低于CPB组(优势比:5.9;95%置信区间:1.1 - 31.1,p = 0.042)。与CPB组相比,非CPB组患者的插管时间更短,分别为21(17.4 - 48.5)小时和41(20.6 - 258.4)小时;p = 0.042。非CPB组的重症监护病房住院时间为7.0(4.75 - 13.5)天,而CPB组为10.0(6.0 - 19.0)天(p = 0.256)。非CPB方法能够快速植入HVAD,围手术期出血和输血需求显著减少,并有助于术后康复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验