Lin J X, Huang C M, Zheng C H, Li P, Xie J W, Wang J B, Lu J, Chen Q Y, Cao L L, Lin M
Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 1;54(10):755-760. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.10.007.
To investigate the surgical outcomes after the laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for patients with advanced gastric cancer. The data of 213 patients who underwent LADG and 213 treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG) were selected using the propensity score matching method from a prospectively constructed database of 641 patients who underwent radical distal gastrectomy between January 2005 and June 2012 in Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. The baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared using a paired -test or the Wilcoxon signed ranks test for continuous variables. The cumulative survival rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Among all patients, there were significant differences in tumor location, digestive tract reconstruction, histologic type, pT stage, and pTNM stage between LADG and ODG group (<0.05). After propensity score matching, patient distributions were closely balanced. There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups (>0.05). Regarding perioperative characteristics, the time to first flatus, and time to resumption of diet, did not differ between the two groups (>0.05), while there were significant differences in the operation time (=-11.28, =0.000), blood loss (=-5.674, =0.000), number of dissected lymph nodes (=4.727, =0.000), and post-operative hospital stay (=-2.193, =0.038). LADG group has less morbidity than ODG group (χ=4.777, =0.029). Multivariate analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery (=0.392, =0.009) was the protected factor for determining postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate at total and each UICC stage between the two groups, either (>0.05). LADG is an oncological safe minimally invasive procedure for advanced gastric cancer yields comparable oncological outcomes with ODG.
探讨进展期胃癌患者行腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术(LADG)后的手术效果。采用倾向评分匹配法,从福建医科大学附属协和医院胃外科2005年1月至2012年6月期间接受根治性远端胃癌切除术的641例患者的前瞻性构建数据库中,选取213例行LADG的患者和213例行开放远端胃癌切除术(ODG)的患者的数据。连续变量采用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较基线特征和手术效果。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩检验比较累积生存率。在所有患者中,LADG组和ODG组在肿瘤位置、消化道重建、组织学类型、pT分期和pTNM分期方面存在显著差异(<0.05)。倾向评分匹配后,两组患者分布密切均衡。两组间临床病理特征无显著差异(>0.05)。关于围手术期特征,两组首次排气时间和恢复饮食时间无差异(>0.05),而手术时间(=-11.28,=0.000)、失血量(=-5.674,=0.000)、清扫淋巴结数目(=4.727,=0.000)和术后住院时间(=-2.193,=0.038)存在显著差异。LADG组的并发症发生率低于ODG组(χ=4.777,=0.029)。多因素分析显示,腹腔镜手术(=0.392,=0.009)是决定术后并发症的保护因素。两组在总生存期和各UICC分期的累积生存率也无显著差异(>0.05)。LADG是一种对进展期胃癌肿瘤学安全的微创手术,其肿瘤学效果与ODG相当。