Suppr超能文献

一项由医生发起的研究性器械豁免临床试验的中期结果,该试验评估了医生改良的血管内移植物用于治疗近肾主动脉瘤。

Midterm results from a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption clinical trial evaluating physician-modified endovascular grafts for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Starnes Benjamin W, Heneghan Rachel E, Tatum Billi

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.123. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report midterm results of an ongoing physician-sponsored investigational device exemption pivotal clinical trial using physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for treatment of patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms who are deemed unfit for open repair.

METHODS

Data from a nonrandomized, prospective, consecutively enrolling investigational device exemption clinical trial were used. Data collection began on April 1, 2011, and data lock occurred on May 31, 2015, with outcomes analysis through December 31, 2015. Primary safety and efficacy end points were used to measure treatment success. The primary safety end point was defined as the proportion of subjects who experienced a major adverse event within 30 days of the procedure. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who achieved treatment success. Treatment success required the following at 12 months: technical success, defined as successful delivery and deployment of a PMEG with preservation of those branch vessels intended to be preserved; and freedom from type I and III endoleak, stent graft migration >10 mm, aortic aneurysm sack enlargement >5 mm, and aortic aneurysm rupture or open conversion.

RESULTS

During the 50-month study period, 64 patients were enrolled; 60 began the implant procedure and 59 received the PMEG implant. Aneurysm anatomy, operative details, and lengths of stay were recorded and included aneurysm diameter (mean, 65.9 mm; range, 49-104 mm), proximal seal zone length (mean, 40.8 mm; range, 18.9-72.2 mm), graft manufacture time (mean, 55.1 minutes), procedure time (mean, 156.8 minutes), fluoroscopy time (mean, 39.6 minutes), contrast material use (mean, 75.3 mL), estimated blood loss (mean, 213 mL), and length of hospital stay (mean, 4.1 days) with intensive care unit length of stay (mean, 2.2 days). There were 145 fenestrations made for 110 renal arteries and 38 superior mesenteric arteries (SMAs). One patient had an SMA stent placed before the procedure for severe stenosis, and one subject had the SMA stented during the procedure. Renal arteries were stented whenever possible (93%). There were 102 stented renal arteries in 58 patients. There were no open conversions or explantations. Thirty-day mortality was 5.1% (3/59). There were zero type Ia, one type Ib, and two type III endoleaks during follow-up treated with successful reintervention. The overall rate of major adverse events at 30 days was 11.9%. The primary efficacy end points were achieved in 94.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These midterm results are favorable and verify our early report that endovascular repair with PMEG is safe and effective for managing patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. PMEG has exceptional midterm rates of morbidity, mortality, and endoleak and may outperform standard endovascular aneurysm repair with favorable anatomy. In patients who are poor open surgical candidates who present with symptomatic or ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms, PMEG continues to be an extremely appealing option as reliable off-the-shelf solutions are not widely available. Preoperative planning remains the key ingredient for success with use of these techniques.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是报告一项正在进行的由医生发起的研究性器械豁免关键临床试验的中期结果,该试验使用医生改良的血管内移植物(PMEG)治疗被认为不适合开放修复的近肾主动脉瘤患者。

方法

使用来自一项非随机、前瞻性、连续入组的研究性器械豁免临床试验的数据。数据收集于2011年4月1日开始,2015年5月31日进行数据锁定,并在2015年12月31日进行结果分析。主要安全性和有效性终点用于衡量治疗成功与否。主要安全性终点定义为在手术30天内发生重大不良事件的受试者比例。主要有效性终点是实现治疗成功的受试者比例。治疗成功在12个月时需要满足以下条件:技术成功,定义为成功输送和部署PMEG并保留那些打算保留的分支血管;无I型和III型内漏、支架移植物迁移>10 mm、主动脉瘤囊增大>5 mm以及主动脉瘤破裂或开放转换。

结果

在50个月的研究期间,共纳入64例患者;60例开始植入手术,59例接受了PMEG植入。记录了动脉瘤解剖结构、手术细节和住院时间,包括动脉瘤直径(平均65.9 mm;范围49 - 104 mm)、近端密封区长度(平均40.8 mm;范围18.9 - 72.2 mm)、移植物制造时间(平均55.1分钟)、手术时间(平均156.8分钟)、透视时间(平均39.6分钟)、造影剂用量(平均75.3 mL)、估计失血量(平均213 mL)以及住院时间(平均4.1天)和重症监护病房住院时间(平均2.2天)。为110条肾动脉和38条肠系膜上动脉(SMA)进行了145次开窗。1例患者因严重狭窄在手术前放置了SMA支架,1例患者在手术过程中对SMA进行了支架置入。尽可能对肾动脉进行支架置入(93%)。58例患者中有102条肾动脉进行了支架置入。没有开放转换或取出移植物的情况。30天死亡率为5.1%(3/59)。随访期间有0例Ia型、1例Ib型和2例III型内漏,经成功再次干预治疗。3天主要不良事件的总体发生率为11.9%。94.1%的患者达到了主要有效性终点。

结论

这些中期结果是令人满意的,证实了我们早期的报告,即使用PMEG进行血管内修复治疗近肾主动脉瘤患者是安全有效的。PMEG在中期的发病率、死亡率和内漏发生率方面表现出色,在解剖结构合适的情况下可能优于标准的血管内动脉瘤修复。对于那些开放手术条件较差、患有有症状或破裂的近肾主动脉瘤的患者,由于可靠的现成解决方案并不广泛可用,PMEG仍然是一个极具吸引力的选择。术前规划仍然是使用这些技术取得成功的关键因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验