Suppr超能文献

垫子特性对身体支撑界面处皮肤温度和湿度的影响。

The effect of cushion properties on skin temperature and humidity at the body-support interface.

作者信息

Hsu Tzu-Wen, Yang Shu-Yu, Liu Jung-Tai, Pan Cheng-Tang, Yang Yu-Sheng

机构信息

a Department of Rehabilitation Medicine , Fangliao General Hospital , Pingtung County , Taiwan.

b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine , Chi-Mei Medical Center (Yong Kang) , Tainan City , Taiwan.

出版信息

Assist Technol. 2018;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1223208. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of various cushions on skin temperature and moisture at the body-seat interface during a 2-hour period of continuous sitting. Seventy-eight participants were randomly assigned to sit on one of the three types of wheelchair cushions for unrelieved sitting for over 2 hours. Skin temperature and relative humidity (RH) were measured under the subjects' ischial tuberosities and thighs bilaterally with digital temperature and humidity sensors. Data were collected before sitting and at 15-minute intervals thereafter. Participants sitting on foam-fluid hybrid cushions showed significantly lower skin temperatures than those sitting on air-filled and foam cushions (p < 0.05), but RH did not differ significantly among the cushions (p = 0.97). The three cushions produced a similar increasing trend in RH over time and RH reached a plateau during the 2-hour sitting period. To select the appropriate wheelchair cushion, the microclimate (heat and moisture control) between the body-seat interface should be considered as well as pressure distribution. In comparison with foam-fluid hybrid cushions, the air-filled rubber and foam cushions tended to increase skin temperature by several degrees after prolonged sitting. However, cushion materials did not have significant differences in moisture accumulations.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨在连续坐立2小时期间,各种坐垫对身体与座椅界面处皮肤温度和湿度的影响。78名参与者被随机分配坐在三种类型的轮椅坐垫中的一种上,持续无支撑坐立超过2小时。使用数字温度和湿度传感器双侧测量受试者坐骨结节和大腿下方的皮肤温度和相对湿度(RH)。在坐立前以及此后每隔15分钟收集一次数据。坐在泡沫 - 流体混合坐垫上的参与者的皮肤温度显著低于坐在充气坐垫和泡沫坐垫上的参与者(p < 0.05),但坐垫之间的RH没有显著差异(p = 0.97)。三种坐垫的RH随时间呈现相似的上升趋势,并且在2小时的坐立期间RH达到平稳状态。为了选择合适的轮椅坐垫,应考虑身体与座椅界面之间的微气候(热量和湿度控制)以及压力分布。与泡沫 - 流体混合坐垫相比,充气橡胶和泡沫坐垫在长时间坐立后往往会使皮肤温度升高几度。然而,坐垫材料在水分积聚方面没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验