Jampol Lee M, Glassman Adam R, Bressler Neil M, Wells John A, Ayala Allison R
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12). doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698.
Post hoc analyses from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network randomized clinical trial comparing aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME) might influence interpretation of study results.
To provide additional outcomes comparing 3 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for DME.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Post hoc analyses performed from May 3, 2016, to June 21, 2016, of a randomized clinical trial performed from August 22, 2012, to September 23, 2015, of 660 participants comparing 3 anti-VEGF treatments in eyes with center-involved DME causing vision impairment.
Randomization to intravitreous aflibercept (2.0 mg), bevacizumab (1.25 mg), or ranibizumab (0.3 mg) administered up to monthly based on a structured retreatment regimen. Focal/grid laser treatment was added after 6 months for the treatment of persistent DME.
Change in visual acuity (VA) area under the curve and change in central subfield thickness (CST) within subgroups based on whether an eye received laser treatment for DME during the study.
Post hoc analyses were performed for 660 participants (mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years; 47% female, 65% white, 16% black or African American, 16% Hispanic, and 3% other). For eyes with an initial VA of 20/50 or worse, VA improvement was greater with aflibercept than the other agents at 1 year but superior only to bevacizumab at 2 years. Mean (SD) letter change in VA over 2 years (area under curve) was greater with aflibercept (+17.1 [9.7]) than with bevacizumab (+12.1 [9.4]; 95% CI, +1.6 to +7.3; P < .001) or ranibizumab (+13.6 [8.5]; 95% CI, +0.7 to +6.0; P = .009). When VA was 20/50 or worse at baseline, bevacizumab reduced CST less than the other agents at 1 year, but at 2 years the differences had diminished. In subgroups stratified by baseline VA, anti-VEGF agent, and whether focal/grid laser treatment was performed for DME, the only participants to have a substantial reduction in mean CST between 1 and 2 years were those with a baseline VA of 20/50 or worse receiving bevacizumab and laser treatment (mean [SD], -55 [108] µm; 95% CI, -82 to -28 µm; P < .001).
Although post hoc analyses should be viewed with caution given the potential for bias, in eyes with a VA of 20/50 or worse, aflibercept has the greatest improvement in VA over 2 years. Focal/grid laser treatment, ceiling and floor effects, or both may account for mean thickness reductions noted only in bevacizumab-treated eyes between 1 and 2 years.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01627249.
糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络的随机临床试验进行的事后分析,比较了阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的效果,这可能会影响对研究结果的解读。
提供比较3种抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物治疗DME的额外结果。
设计、设置和参与者:对2012年8月22日至2015年9月23日进行的一项随机临床试验进行事后分析,该试验纳入了660名参与者,比较了3种抗VEGF治疗方法对累及中心凹的DME导致视力损害的眼睛的疗效。该事后分析于2016年5月3日至2016年6月21日进行。
根据结构化的再治疗方案,随机接受玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(2.0mg)、贝伐单抗(1.25mg)或雷珠单抗(0.3mg),每月给药一次。6个月后添加局部/格栅激光治疗以治疗持续性DME。
根据眼睛在研究期间是否接受DME激光治疗,在亚组中比较曲线下视力(VA)变化和中心子野厚度(CST)变化。
对660名参与者进行了事后分析(平均[标准差]年龄,61[10]岁;47%为女性,65%为白人,16%为黑人或非裔美国人,16%为西班牙裔,3%为其他种族)。对于初始视力为20/50或更差的眼睛,阿柏西普在1年时的视力改善比其他药物更大,但在2年时仅优于贝伐单抗。阿柏西普在2年期间的平均(标准差)视力字母变化(曲线下面积)为+17.1[9.7],大于贝伐单抗(+12.1[9.4];95%置信区间,+1.6至+7.3;P<0.001)或雷珠单抗(+13.6[8.5];95%置信区间,+0.7至+6.0;P = 0.009)。当基线视力为20/50或更差时,贝伐单抗在1年时降低CST的程度小于其他药物,但在2年时差异减小。在根据基线视力、抗VEGF药物以及是否对DME进行局部/格栅激光治疗分层的亚组中,1至2年期间平均CST有显著降低的唯一参与者是基线视力为20/50或更差且接受贝伐单抗和激光治疗的患者(平均[标准差],-55[108]µm;95%置信区间,-82至-28µm;P<0.001)。
尽管考虑到存在偏倚的可能性,事后分析应谨慎看待,但对于视力为20/50或更差的眼睛,阿柏西普在2年期间的视力改善最大。局部/格栅激光治疗、天花板效应和地板效应,或两者兼而有之,可能是仅在1至2年期间接受贝伐单抗治疗的眼睛中观察到平均厚度降低的原因。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT01627249。