Waldron Nicholas, Johnson Claire E, Saul Peter, Waldron Heidi, Chong Jeffrey C, Hill Anne-Marie, Hayes Barbara
Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Armadale Kelmscott Memorial Hospital, 3056 Albany Highway, Armadale, 6112, Western Australia, Australia.
Health Strategy and Networks, System Policy and Planning, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, 189 Royal Street, East Perth, 6004, Western Australia, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1803-x.
Advance cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decision-making and escalation of care discussions are variable in routine clinical practice. We aimed to explore physician barriers to advance CPR decision-making in an inpatient hospital setting and develop a pragmatic intervention to support clinicians to undertake and document routine advance care planning discussions.
Two focus groups, which involved eight consultants and ten junior doctors, were conducted following a review of the current literature. A subsequent iterative consensus process developed two intervention elements: (i) an updated 'Goals of Patient Care' (GOPC) form and process; (ii) an education video and resources for teaching advance CPR decision-making and communication. A multidisciplinary group of health professionals and policy-makers with experience in systems development, education and research provided critical feedback.
Three key themes emerged from the focus groups and the literature, which identified a structure for the intervention: (i) knowing what to say; (ii) knowing how to say it; (iii) wanting to say it. The themes informed the development of a video to provide education about advance CPR decision-making framework, improving communication and contextualising relevant clinical issues. Critical feedback assisted in refining the video and further guided development and evolution of a medical GOPC approach to discussing and recording medical treatment and advance care plans.
Through an iterative process of consultation and review, video-based education and an expanded GOPC form and approach were developed to address physician and systemic barriers to advance CPR decision-making and documentation. Implementation and evaluation across hospital settings is required to examine utility and determine effect on quality of care.
在常规临床实践中,预先心肺复苏(CPR)决策及护理升级讨论存在差异。我们旨在探究住院医院环境中医生在预先CPR决策方面的障碍,并制定一种实用干预措施,以支持临床医生进行并记录常规的预先护理计划讨论。
在对当前文献进行综述后,开展了两个焦点小组讨论,其中包括八名顾问医生和十名初级医生。随后的迭代共识过程形成了两个干预要素:(i)更新后的“患者护理目标”(GOPC)表格及流程;(ii)用于教授预先CPR决策和沟通的教育视频及资源。一个由具有系统开发、教育和研究经验的多学科卫生专业人员和政策制定者组成的小组提供了关键反馈。
焦点小组讨论和文献中出现了三个关键主题,确定了干预措施的结构:(i)知道该说什么;(ii)知道如何表达;(iii)愿意表达。这些主题为制作一个视频提供了依据,该视频用于提供关于预先CPR决策框架的教育,改善沟通并将相关临床问题情境化。关键反馈有助于完善视频,并进一步指导了一种医疗GOPC方法的开发和演变,该方法用于讨论和记录医疗治疗及预先护理计划。
通过反复的咨询和审查过程,开发了基于视频的教育以及扩展的GOPC表格和方法来解决医生在预先CPR决策和记录方面的障碍以及系统障碍。需要在医院环境中进行实施和评估,以检验其效用并确定对护理质量的影响。