Lee Hae Won, Suh Kyung-Suk
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;22(3):309-318. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0042. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
There has been ongoing debate that the Milan criteria may be too strict that a significant number of patients who could benefit from liver transplantation (LT) might have been excluded. Based on this idea, various studies have been conducted to further expand the Milan criteria and give more HCC patients a chance of cure. In deceased donor LT (DDLT) setting, expansion of the criteria is relatively tempered because the results of LT for HCC should be comparable to those of patients with non-malignant indications. On the other hand, in living donor LT (LDLT) situation, liver grafts are not public resources. The acceptable target outcomes for LDLT might be much lower than those for DDLT. Patients with biologically favorable tumors might have excellent survivals after LT despite morphological advanced HCCs. Therefore, the significance and utility of biological tumor parameters for selecting suitable LT candidates have been increased to predict HCC recurrence after LT. Although there is no consensus regarding the use of prognostic biomarkers in LT selection criteria for HCC, the combination of conventional morphological parameters and new promising biomarkers could help us refine and expand the LT criteria for HCC in the near future.
一直存在这样的争论,即米兰标准可能过于严格,以至于大量可能从肝移植(LT)中获益的患者可能被排除在外。基于这一想法,已经开展了各种研究以进一步扩大米兰标准,让更多的肝癌患者有治愈的机会。在尸体供肝肝移植(DDLT)中,标准的扩大相对缓和,因为肝癌肝移植的结果应与非恶性指征患者的结果相当。另一方面,在活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)中,肝脏移植物不是公共资源。LDLT可接受的目标结果可能远低于DDLT。生物学行为良好的肿瘤患者尽管形态学上为晚期肝癌,但肝移植后可能有良好的生存率。因此,生物学肿瘤参数在选择合适的肝移植候选者以预测肝移植后肝癌复发方面的意义和实用性已有所增加。尽管在肝癌肝移植选择标准中使用预后生物标志物尚无共识,但传统形态学参数与新的有前景的生物标志物的结合可能有助于我们在不久的将来完善和扩大肝癌的肝移植标准。