Suppr超能文献

远程访问机器人辅助甲状腺切除术:多机构经验。

Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy: A Multi-institutional Experience.

作者信息

Duke William S, Holsinger F Christopher, Kandil Emad, Richmon Jeremy D, Singer Michael C, Terris David J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology and Endocrinology, Augusta University Thyroid and Parathyroid Center, Augusta University, 1120 Fifteenth Street, BP-4109, Augusta, GA, 30912-4060, USA.

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):116-121. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3738-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 %) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12-69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 % of cases; 8.8 % were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0-5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82-265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 %) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 %) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 %) and without a drain (65.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助甲状腺切除术(RFT)是一种通过远离甲状腺的切口部位进行甲状腺手术的新方法。早期良好的效果促使了这次多机构的验证性研究。

方法

收集了北美五家学术性内分泌外科机构连续接受RFT手术患者的前瞻性数据。评估了手术指征、手术时间、最终病理结果、结节大小、并发症以及术后管理(引流管使用情况和住院时间)。

结果

90例患者共进行了102例RFT手术。除1例患者外,其余所有患者(98.9%)为女性,平均年龄为41.9±13.1岁(范围12 - 69岁)。91.2%的病例手术指征为结节性疾病;8.8%为因癌症诊断而进行的再次手术。最大结节的平均大小为1.9厘米(范围0 - 5.6厘米)。甲状腺叶切除术的平均总手术时间为162分钟(范围82 - 265分钟)。未发生永久性并发症。有4例(3.9%)出现短暂性喉返神经麻痹,无低钙血症病例,3例(2.9%)出现血肿。无一例转为颈前入路手术。大多数患者为门诊手术(61.8%)且未放置引流管(65.7%)。

结论

RFT在特定患者中技术上可行且安全。对于精心挑选的患者,RFT可作为避免颈部可见瘢痕的一种方法继续提供。未来有必要进行前瞻性研究,将这种新方法与其他远程入路方法进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验