Suppr超能文献

1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)不同表达对80岁及以上成年人群不良结局的预测价值

Predictive Value of Different Expressions of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) for Adverse Outcomes in a Cohort of Adults Aged 80 and Older.

作者信息

Hegendörfer Eralda, Vaes Bert, Andreeva Elena, Matheï Catharina, Van Pottelbergh Gijs, Degryse Jean-Marie

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Institute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Feb 1;18(2):123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) is proposed as a marker of healthy ageing and FEV expressions that are independent of reference values have been reported to be better at predicting mortality in older adults. We assess and compare the predictive value of different FEV expressions for mortality, hospitalization, and physical and mental decline in adults aged 80 and older.

DESIGN

Population-based, prospective, cohort study.

SETTING

The BELFRAIL study, Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 501 community-dwelling adults aged 80 and older (mean age 84.7 years).

MEASUREMENTS

Baseline FEV expressed as percent predicted (FEVPP) and z-score (FEVZ) using the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 reference values; over lowest sex-specific percentile (FEVQ), and height squared (FEV/Ht) and cubed (FEV/Ht). Mortality data until 5.1 ± 0.2 years from baseline; hospitalization data until 3.0 ± 0.25 years. Activities of daily living, battery of physical performance tests, Mini-Mental State Examination, and 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale at baseline and after 1.7 ± 0.2 years.

RESULTS

Individuals in the lowest quartile of FEV expressions had higher adjusted risk than the rest of study population for all-cause mortality (highest hazard ratio 2.05 [95% Confidence Interval 1.50-2.80] for FEVQ and 2.01 [1.47-2.76] for FEV/Ht), first hospitalization (highest hazard ratio 1.63 [1.21-2.16] for FEV/Ht and 1.61[1.20-2.16] for FEV/Ht), mental decline (highest odds ratio 2.80 [1.61-4.89] for FEVQ) and physical decline (only FEV/Ht with odds ratio 1.93 [1.13-3.30]). Based on risk classification improvement measures, FEV/Ht and FEVQ performed better than FEVPP.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of adults aged 80 and older, FEV expressions that are independent of reference values (FEV/Ht and FEVQ) were better at predicting adverse health outcomes than traditional expressions that depend on reference values, and should be used in further research on FEV and aging.

摘要

目的

一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)被提议作为健康衰老的一个标志物,并且据报道,独立于参考值的FEV表达在预测老年人死亡率方面表现更佳。我们评估并比较不同FEV表达对80岁及以上成年人的死亡率、住院率以及身体和心理衰退的预测价值。

设计

基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。

地点

比利时的BELFRAIL研究。

参与者

共有501名80岁及以上的社区居住成年人(平均年龄84.7岁)。

测量指标

使用全球肺功能倡议2012参考值将基线FEV表示为预测值百分比(FEVPP)和z分数(FEVZ);低于最低性别特异性百分位数(FEVQ),以及身高平方(FEV/Ht²)和身高立方(FEV/Ht³)。记录从基线起5.1±0.2年的死亡率数据;3.0±0.25年的住院数据。在基线时以及1.7±0.2年后测量日常生活活动能力、一系列身体性能测试、简易精神状态检查表和15项老年抑郁量表。

结果

FEV表达处于最低四分位数的个体在全因死亡率(FEVQ的最高风险比为2.05[95%置信区间1.50 - 2.80],FEV/Ht²的最高风险比为2.01[1.47 - 2.76])、首次住院(FEV/Ht³的最高风险比为1.63[1.21 - 2.16],FEV/Ht²的最高风险比为1.61[1.20 - 2.16])、心理衰退(FEVQ的最高优势比为2.80[1.61 - 4.89])和身体衰退(仅FEV/Ht²的优势比为1.93[1.13 - 3.30])方面,其调整后的风险高于研究人群的其他部分。基于风险分类改善措施,FEV/Ht²和FEVQ的表现优于FEVPP。

结论

在一个80岁及以上成年人的队列中,独立于参考值的FEV表达(FEV/Ht²和FEVQ)在预测不良健康结局方面比依赖参考值的传统表达更好,应在关于FEV与衰老的进一步研究中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验