Minichmayr Iris K, Schaeftlein André, Kuti Joseph L, Zeitlinger Markus, Kloft Charlotte
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstr. 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany.
Graduate Research Training Program PharMetrX, Berlin, Germany.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Jun;56(6):617-633. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0463-7.
We aimed to assess linezolid pharmacokinetics in the plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of patients with sepsis, diabetic foot infections or cystic fibrosis and healthy volunteers. The impacts of joint characteristics and disease on plasma and target-site exposure were to be identified together with the benefit of dose intensification in critically ill patients.
Rich plasma (n = 1598) and ISF concentrations in subcutaneous adipose (n = 1430) and muscle tissue (n = 1089) measured by microdialysis were pooled from three clinical trials with 51 individuals receiving 600 mg of intravenous and oral linezolid. All data were analysed simultaneously by a population approach also considering methodological aspects of microdialysis. The impact of covariates on the attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, AUC/MIC = 100 (area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration) and fT = 99 % (time that unbound concentrations exceed the MIC), was assessed by deterministic and Monte Carlo simulations.
A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with nonlinear elimination and tissue distribution factors accounting for differences between plasma and ISF concentrations adequately predicted all measurements. Clearance (CL) was highest in septic patients (11.2 L/h vs. CL/CL/CL = 7.67/6.87/6.35 L/h). Penetration into subcutaneous adipose ISF was lowest in diabetic patients (-34.9 % compared with healthy volunteers). Creatinine clearance and total body weight further impacted linezolid exposure. To achieve timely efficacious therapy, front-loaded dosing and continuous infusion seemed beneficial in septic patients.
Our analysis suggests that after standard linezolid doses, particularly patients with sepsis and conserved renal function are at risk of not attaining pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and would benefit from initial dose intensification.
我们旨在评估脓毒症、糖尿病足感染或囊性纤维化患者以及健康志愿者血浆和组织间隙液(ISF)中利奈唑胺的药代动力学。同时确定关节特征和疾病对血浆及靶部位暴露的影响,以及重症患者剂量强化的益处。
通过微透析测量的51例接受600mg静脉和口服利奈唑胺患者的丰富血浆(n = 1598)以及皮下脂肪(n = 1430)和肌肉组织(n = 1089)中的ISF浓度,来自三项临床试验。所有数据采用群体方法进行同时分析,同时考虑微透析的方法学方面。通过确定性和蒙特卡洛模拟评估协变量对药代动力学/药效学目标(AUC/MIC = 100,浓度-时间曲线下面积/最低抑菌浓度;fT = 99%,游离浓度超过MIC的时间)达成情况的影响。
具有非线性消除和组织分布因子的二室药代动力学模型,考虑了血浆和ISF浓度之间的差异,能够充分预测所有测量值。清除率(CL)在脓毒症患者中最高(11.2L/h,而在其他组中CL分别为7.67/6.87/6.35L/h)。糖尿病患者皮下脂肪ISF中的渗透最低(与健康志愿者相比降低-34.9%)。肌酐清除率和总体重进一步影响利奈唑胺的暴露。为实现及时有效的治疗,负荷剂量给药和持续输注在脓毒症患者中似乎有益。
我们的分析表明,在使用标准利奈唑胺剂量后,尤其是脓毒症且肾功能正常的患者有未达到药代动力学/药效学目标的风险,初始剂量强化可能有益。