Suppr超能文献

双眼竞争动态中所反映的感官眼优势的个体差异。

Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

作者信息

Dieter Kevin C, Sy Jocelyn L, Blake Randolph

机构信息

Vanderbilt Vision Research Center and Dept. of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37240, USA.

Vanderbilt Vision Research Center and Dept. of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37240, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

Abstract

Normal binocular vision emerges from the combination of neural signals arising within separate monocular pathways. It is natural to wonder whether both eyes contribute equally to the unified cyclopean impression we ordinarily experience. Binocular rivalry, which occurs when the inputs to the two eyes are markedly different, affords a useful means for quantifying the balance of influence exerted by the eyes (called sensory eye dominance, SED) and for relating that degree of balance to other aspects of binocular visual function. However, the precise ways in which binocular rivalry dynamics change when the eyes are unbalanced remain uncharted. Relying on widespread individual variability in the relative predominance of the two eyes as demonstrated in previous studies, we found that an observer's overall tendency to see one eye more than the other was driven both by differences in the relative duration and frequency of instances of that eye's perceptual dominance. Specifically, larger imbalances between the eyes were associated with longer and more frequent periods of exclusive dominance for the stronger eye. Increases in occurrences of dominant eye percepts were mediated in part by a tendency to experience "return transitions" to the predominant eye - that is, observers often experienced sequential exclusive percepts of the dominant eye's image with an intervening mixed percept. Together, these results indicate that the often-observed imbalances between the eyes during binocular rivalry reflect true differences in sensory processing, a finding that has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms underlying binocular vision in general.

摘要

正常的双眼视觉源于独立单眼通路中产生的神经信号的组合。自然而然会让人思考,两只眼睛对我们通常所体验到的统一的独眼印象的贡献是否相等。双眼竞争现象,即当两只眼睛的输入明显不同时发生的情况,为量化眼睛施加的影响平衡(称为感觉眼优势,SED)以及将该平衡程度与双眼视觉功能的其他方面联系起来提供了一种有用的方法。然而,当双眼不平衡时,双眼竞争动态变化的确切方式仍未明确。基于先前研究中所展示的两只眼睛相对优势存在广泛个体差异,我们发现观察者总体上倾向于看到一只眼睛多于另一只眼睛,这是由该眼感知优势实例的相对持续时间和频率差异共同驱动的。具体而言,双眼之间更大的不平衡与优势较强的眼睛更长且更频繁的独占优势期相关。优势眼感知出现次数的增加部分是由向优势眼的“返回转换”倾向介导的——也就是说,观察者经常会经历优势眼图像的连续独占感知,并伴有中间的混合感知。总之,这些结果表明,在双眼竞争期间经常观察到的双眼不平衡反映了感觉处理方面的真正差异,这一发现对我们总体上理解双眼视觉的机制具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
2
3
Perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry is prolonged by a dynamic surround.
Vision Res. 2013 Nov;92:33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
Monocular Perceptual Deprivation from Interocular Suppression Temporarily Imbalances Ocular Dominance.
Curr Biol. 2017 Mar 20;27(6):884-889. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.063. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Short-term monocular deprivation reduces inter-ocular suppression of the deprived eye.
Vision Res. 2020 Aug;173:29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 24.
7
Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry.
J Vis. 2010 Aug 26;10(10):27. doi: 10.1167/10.10.27.
8
A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance.
Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2386-97. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
10
Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State.
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 23;39(43):8527-8537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0713-19.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The neurochemistry of learning-driven sensory eye dominance plasticity.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jul 22;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00237. eCollection 2024.
2
Variations in sensory eye dominance along the horizontal meridian.
J Vis. 2025 Jul 1;25(8):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.8.1.
3
Temporal Frequency Modulation of Binocular Balance in Normal and Amblyopic Vision.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Apr 1;66(4):8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.4.8.
4
Assessing Ocular Dominance: Rethinking the Current Paradigm.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Mar 26;51(7):592-9. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001659.
5
Which perceptual categories do observers experience during multistable perception?
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 24:2024.09.24.614648. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.24.614648.
6
Measuring the reliability of binocular rivalry.
J Vis. 2023 Sep 1;23(10):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.10.5.
7
New insights into binocular rivalry from the reconstruction of evolving percepts using model network dynamics.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2023 Mar 24;17:1137015. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1137015. eCollection 2023.
8
Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Mar 1;12(3):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.18.
9
Neural Dynamics during Binocular Rivalry: Indications from Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.
eNeuro. 2023 Jan 13;10(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0470-22.2022. Print 2023 Jan.
10
Neural Correlates of Sensory Eye Dominance in Human Visual White Matter Tracts.
eNeuro. 2022 Nov 23;9(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0232-22.2022. Print 2022 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Intuition: Nonconscious Emotional Information Boosts Decision Accuracy and Confidence.
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):622-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797616629403. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
2
Visual input signaling threat gains preferential access to awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm.
Cognition. 2016 Apr;149:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Chronic and acute biases in perceptual stabilization.
J Vis. 2015;15(16):4. doi: 10.1167/15.16.4.
4
Deconstructing Interocular Suppression: Attention and Divisive Normalization.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 30;11(10):e1004510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004510. eCollection 2015 Oct.
5
Binocular rivalry: competition and inhibition in visual perception.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;3(1):87-103. doi: 10.1002/wcs.151. Epub 2011 May 18.
7
A population study of binocular function.
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt A):34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
Ocular dominance and visual function testing.
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:238943. doi: 10.1155/2013/238943. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
GABA shapes the dynamics of bistable perception.
Curr Biol. 2013 May 6;23(9):823-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.067. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
10
Normalization regulates competition for visual awareness.
Neuron. 2012 Aug 9;75(3):531-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.032.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验