Dieter Kevin C, Sy Jocelyn L, Blake Randolph
Vanderbilt Vision Research Center and Dept. of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37240, USA.
Vanderbilt Vision Research Center and Dept. of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37240, USA.
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Normal binocular vision emerges from the combination of neural signals arising within separate monocular pathways. It is natural to wonder whether both eyes contribute equally to the unified cyclopean impression we ordinarily experience. Binocular rivalry, which occurs when the inputs to the two eyes are markedly different, affords a useful means for quantifying the balance of influence exerted by the eyes (called sensory eye dominance, SED) and for relating that degree of balance to other aspects of binocular visual function. However, the precise ways in which binocular rivalry dynamics change when the eyes are unbalanced remain uncharted. Relying on widespread individual variability in the relative predominance of the two eyes as demonstrated in previous studies, we found that an observer's overall tendency to see one eye more than the other was driven both by differences in the relative duration and frequency of instances of that eye's perceptual dominance. Specifically, larger imbalances between the eyes were associated with longer and more frequent periods of exclusive dominance for the stronger eye. Increases in occurrences of dominant eye percepts were mediated in part by a tendency to experience "return transitions" to the predominant eye - that is, observers often experienced sequential exclusive percepts of the dominant eye's image with an intervening mixed percept. Together, these results indicate that the often-observed imbalances between the eyes during binocular rivalry reflect true differences in sensory processing, a finding that has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms underlying binocular vision in general.
正常的双眼视觉源于独立单眼通路中产生的神经信号的组合。自然而然会让人思考,两只眼睛对我们通常所体验到的统一的独眼印象的贡献是否相等。双眼竞争现象,即当两只眼睛的输入明显不同时发生的情况,为量化眼睛施加的影响平衡(称为感觉眼优势,SED)以及将该平衡程度与双眼视觉功能的其他方面联系起来提供了一种有用的方法。然而,当双眼不平衡时,双眼竞争动态变化的确切方式仍未明确。基于先前研究中所展示的两只眼睛相对优势存在广泛个体差异,我们发现观察者总体上倾向于看到一只眼睛多于另一只眼睛,这是由该眼感知优势实例的相对持续时间和频率差异共同驱动的。具体而言,双眼之间更大的不平衡与优势较强的眼睛更长且更频繁的独占优势期相关。优势眼感知出现次数的增加部分是由向优势眼的“返回转换”倾向介导的——也就是说,观察者经常会经历优势眼图像的连续独占感知,并伴有中间的混合感知。总之,这些结果表明,在双眼竞争期间经常观察到的双眼不平衡反映了感觉处理方面的真正差异,这一发现对我们总体上理解双眼视觉的机制具有启示意义。