Suppr超能文献

针对具有非洲裔纹理头发的个体的新型毛囊单位提取工具的比较研究。

Comparative Study of a Novel Tool for Follicular Unit Extraction for Individuals with Afro-textured Hair.

作者信息

Umar Sanusi

机构信息

Dermatology Division, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Calif.; and FineTouch Dermatology, Inc., Redondo Beach, Calif.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Sep 27;4(9):e1069. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001069. eCollection 2016 Sep.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Hair transplantation involving patients with tightly curled Afro-textured hair using follicular unit extraction (FUE) employing conventional rotary punches frequently leads to unacceptably high transection rates. These patients are unsuitable candidates for FUE hair transplantation. Transection rates were observed during FUE in a case series of 18 patients with tightly curled Afro-textured hair using different punches.

METHODS

Three different punches were sequentially used in patients to extract follicular units with several needle gauges until satisfactory transection rates occurred: conventional sharp and dull rotary punches, followed by a 2-pronged curved nonrotary punch.

RESULTS

In all instances, the curved nonrotary punch had the best transection rate of <5%. Sharp and dull rotary punches completely failed or had excessive transection rates in 8 patients. The dull rotary punch performed better than the sharp rotary punch in 9 patients in whom it was used with few restrictions compared to 5 patients in whom there were more restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS

A curved nonrotary punch configured to accommodate the curliness of tightly curled Afro-textured hair can overcome high transection rates experienced using conventional sharp or dull rotary punches. Limitations of this study include it being a small, retrospective case series, and that the new technique that could require additional training by current FUE hair transplant practitioners.

摘要

未标注

使用传统旋转打孔器进行毛囊单位提取(FUE)的涉及紧密卷曲非洲裔发质患者的毛发移植,常常导致不可接受的高横断率。这些患者不适宜进行FUE毛发移植。在一个包含18例紧密卷曲非洲裔发质患者的病例系列中,使用不同打孔器进行FUE时观察了横断率。

方法

依次在患者中使用三种不同的打孔器,用几种针规提取毛囊单位,直到出现令人满意的横断率:传统的尖锐和钝头旋转打孔器,然后是双叉弯曲非旋转打孔器。

结果

在所有情况下,弯曲非旋转打孔器的横断率最佳,<5%。尖锐和钝头旋转打孔器在8例患者中完全失败或横断率过高。钝头旋转打孔器在9例使用限制较少的患者中表现优于尖锐旋转打孔器,而在5例使用限制较多的患者中则不然。

结论

一种配置为适应紧密卷曲非洲裔发质卷曲度的弯曲非旋转打孔器,可以克服使用传统尖锐或钝头旋转打孔器时出现的高横断率。本研究的局限性包括它是一个小型回顾性病例系列,以及新技术可能需要当前FUE毛发移植从业者进行额外培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/5055031/af7a1d361c88/gox-4-e1069-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验