Suppr超能文献

DRI氢可酮/氢吗啡酮免疫分析法在较低临界值临床环境中的适用性:采用液相色谱-串联质谱分析法进行验证

Suitability of the DRI Hydrocodone/Hydromorphone Immunoassay in the Clinical Environment at a Lower Cutoff: Validation With LC-MS/MS Analysis.

作者信息

Dixon Robert B, Dasgupta Amitava

机构信息

*Physician's Choice Laboratory Services, Rock Hill, SC; and †Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 2016 Dec;38(6):787-790. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000339.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the analytical performance of the DRI hydrocodone/hydromorphone assay by comparing semiquantitative values obtained by this assay with values obtained by a liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. We also evaluated the possibility of lowering the cutoff of the DRI assay from 300 to 100 ng/mL.

METHODS

We compared semiquantitative values obtained by the DRI assay in 97 specimens with values obtained by the LC-MS/MS method including 10 specimens containing hydrocodone and/or hydromorphone concentrations between 105.0 and 145.0 ng/mL (determined by LC-MS/MS) to determine the sensitivity at 100 ng/mL. In addition, several opioids at a concentration of 5000 ng/mL were also analyzed by the DRI assay to determine its specificity.

RESULTS

We observed no false-negative result using the DRI immunoassay in 96 specimens that showed semiquantitative values at 100 ng/mL or higher. However, one specimen containing 110 ng/mL of hydrocodone was false negative with the DRI assay (semiquantitative value 88 ng/mL, below 100 ng/mL cutoff). The semiquantitative values produced by DRI showed poor correlation with values determined by the LC-MS/MS method. The sensitivity of the DRI assay at 100 ng/mL was 90%, and the assay was very specific showing minimal cross-reactivity only with oxycodone and oxymorphone.

CONCLUSIONS

DRI immunoassay for hydrocodone/hydromorphone is a cost-effective method of screening urine specimens in the clinical environment at a lower cutoff of 100 ng/mL.

摘要

背景

我们通过将DRI氢可酮/氢吗啡酮检测法获得的半定量值与液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)获得的值进行比较,评估了该检测法的分析性能。我们还评估了将DRI检测法的临界值从300 ng/mL降至100 ng/mL的可能性。

方法

我们将97份标本中DRI检测法获得的半定量值与LC-MS/MS法获得的值进行比较,其中包括10份含有浓度在105.0至145.0 ng/mL之间的氢可酮和/或氢吗啡酮的标本(由LC-MS/MS测定),以确定在100 ng/mL时的灵敏度。此外,还用DRI检测法分析了几种浓度为5000 ng/mL的阿片类药物,以确定其特异性。

结果

我们在96份半定量值为100 ng/mL或更高的标本中使用DRI免疫检测法未观察到假阴性结果。然而,一份含有110 ng/mL氢可酮的标本在DRI检测法中为假阴性(半定量值88 ng/mL,低于100 ng/mL临界值)。DRI产生的半定量值与LC-MS/MS法测定的值相关性较差。DRI检测法在100 ng/mL时的灵敏度为90%,该检测法非常特异,仅与羟考酮和羟吗啡酮有最小的交叉反应性。

结论

用于氢可酮/氢吗啡酮的DRI免疫检测法是一种在临床环境中以100 ng/mL的较低临界值筛查尿液标本的经济有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验