Suppr超能文献

佛罗里达州花卉作物中蒸汽和土壤太阳能消毒防治效果评估

Evaluation of Steam and Soil Solarization for Control in Florida Floriculture Crops.

作者信息

Kokalis-Burelle Nancy, Rosskopf Erin N, Butler David M, Fennimore Steven A, Holzinger John

机构信息

USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Lab, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945.

University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

出版信息

J Nematol. 2016 Sep;48(3):183-192. doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2017-026.

Abstract

Steam and soil solarization were investigated for control of the root-knot nematode in 2 yr of field trials on a commercial flower farm in Florida. The objective was to determine if preplant steam treatments in combination with solarization, or solarization alone effectively controlled nematodes compared to methyl bromide (MeBr). Trials were conducted in a field with naturally occurring populations of . Treatments were solarization alone, steam treatment after solarization using standard 7.6-cm-diameter perforated plastic drain tile (steam 1), steam treatment following solarization using custom-drilled plastic drain tile with 1.6-mm holes spaced every 3.8 cm (steam 2), and MeBr applied at 392 kg/ha 80:20 MeBr:chloropicrin. Drain tiles were buried approximately 35 cm deep with four tiles per 1.8 by 30 m plot. Steam application followed a 4-wk solarization period concluding in mid-October. All steam was generated using a Sioux propane boiler system. Plots were steamed for sufficient time to reach the target temperature of 70°C for 20 min. Solarization plastic was retained on the plots during steaming and plots were covered with a single layer of carpet padding to provide additional insulation. The floriculture crops larkspur ( and × ), snapdragon (), and sunflower () were produced according to standard commercial practices. One month after treatment in both years of the study, soil populations of were lower in both steam treatments and in MeBr compared to solarization alone. At the end of the season in both years, galling on larkspur, snapdragon, and sunflowers was lower in both steam treatments than in solarization. Both steam treatments also provided control of in soil at the end of the season comparable to, or exceeding that provided by MeBr. Both steam treatments also reduced in snapdragon roots comparable to, or exceeding control with MeBr. in soil increased in solarization alone. Solarization alone also had higher gall ratings on larkspur, snapdragon, and sunflower than all other treatments. Steam provided excellent control of in this study.

摘要

在佛罗里达州一个商业花卉农场进行了为期两年的田间试验,研究蒸汽处理和土壤太阳能消毒法对根结线虫的防治效果。目的是确定种植前蒸汽处理与太阳能消毒法相结合,或单独使用太阳能消毒法,与甲基溴(MeBr)相比,是否能有效控制线虫。试验在一个有线虫自然种群的田块中进行。处理方式包括单独太阳能消毒法、太阳能消毒后使用标准直径7.6厘米的多孔塑料排水瓦进行蒸汽处理(蒸汽处理1)、太阳能消毒后使用定制的每3.8厘米有1.6毫米孔的塑料排水瓦进行蒸汽处理(蒸汽处理2),以及以392千克/公顷的用量施用80:20的MeBr:氯化苦。排水瓦埋深约35厘米,每1.8×30米的地块埋四块。蒸汽处理在10月中旬为期4周的太阳能消毒期结束后进行。所有蒸汽均使用苏族丙烷锅炉系统产生。地块蒸至目标温度70°C并保持20分钟。蒸汽处理期间,太阳能消毒塑料膜保留在地块上,地块覆盖一层地毯衬垫以提供额外保温。根据标准商业种植方法种植花卉作物翠雀( 和 × )、金鱼草()和向日葵()。在研究的两年中,处理后一个月,与单独太阳能消毒法相比,蒸汽处理和MeBr处理后的土壤线虫数量均较低。在两年的季节结束时,蒸汽处理的翠雀、金鱼草和向日葵上的虫瘿均少于太阳能消毒法处理的。两种蒸汽处理在季节结束时对土壤线虫的防治效果与MeBr相当或超过MeBr。两种蒸汽处理对金鱼草根部线虫的防治效果也与MeBr相当或超过MeBr。单独太阳能消毒法处理后土壤中线虫数量增加。单独太阳能消毒法处理的翠雀、金鱼草和向日葵上的虫瘿评级也高于所有其他处理。在本研究中,蒸汽对线虫有极佳的防治效果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Steam and Soil Solarization for Control in Florida Floriculture Crops.
J Nematol. 2016 Sep;48(3):183-192. doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2017-026.
10
Grafting and Paladin Pic-21 for Nematode and Weed Management in Vegetable Production.
J Nematol. 2016 Dec;48(4):231-240. doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2017-031.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Safe Approaches to Manage Plant-Parasitic Nematodes.
Plants (Basel). 2021 Sep 14;10(9):1911. doi: 10.3390/plants10091911.
2
Recent Advances in the Development of Environmentally Benign Treatments to Control Root-Knot Nematodes.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 22;11:1125. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01125. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Managing nematodes without methyl bromide.
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:311-28. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114425.
5
Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide.
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41:325-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095514.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验