TUBITAK, Marmara Research Center, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Institute, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Uludag University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Bursa, Turkey.
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2017 Feb;1861(2):218-234. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
To overcome the hurdles of cisplatin, majorly its toxicity and resistance, there has been extensive search for alternative anti-cancer metal-based compounds. Here, three Cu(II)-complexes, Cu(Sal-Gly)(phen), Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine), Cu(Sal-Gly)(phepoxy) are characterized for their interaction with DNA, cytotoxicity and mechanism of action.
The binding ability of the complexes to Calf-Thymus DNA was evaluated by competition fluorescence studies with thiazole-orange, UV-Vis and circular dichroism spectroscopic titrations. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT analysis. The DNA damage was analyzed through cleavage of supercoiled DNA via agarose gel-electrophoresis, and 8-oxo-guanidine and ɣH2AX staining in cells. Apoptosis was detected via DNA condensation/fragmentation, mitochondrial membrane potential, Annexin V staining and caspase 3/7 activity. Formation of reactive oxygen species was determined by DCFDA- and GSSG/GSH-analysis.
Binding constants to DNA were evaluated as 1.7×10 (Cu(Sal-Gly)(phen)), 2.5×10 (Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine)) and 3.2×10 (Cu(Sal-Gly)(phepoxy)). All compounds induced DNA damage. Apoptosis was the main form of cell death. There was an increase in ROS, which is most likely responsible for the observed DNA-damage. Although the compounds were cytotoxic to all tested cancer cell lines, only Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine) displayed significantly lower toxicity towards non-cancer cells, its associated phenotypes differing from the other two Cu-complexes. Thus, Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine) was further assayed for molecular changes in response to drug treatment using a custom designed RT-qPCR array. Results showed that Harakiri was significantly upregulated. Presence of p53 was not required for apoptosis in response to Cu-complexes.
These Cu-complexes, namely Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine), may be considered promising anticancer agents with activity in cancer cells even with deficient p53 status.
为了克服顺铂的障碍,主要是其毒性和耐药性,人们一直在广泛寻找替代的抗癌金属基化合物。在这里,我们对三种 Cu(II)-配合物 Cu(Sal-Gly)(phen)、Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine) 和 Cu(Sal-Gly)(phepoxy)进行了表征,以研究它们与 DNA 的相互作用、细胞毒性和作用机制。
通过噻唑橙竞争荧光研究、紫外可见和圆二色性光谱滴定评估复合物与小牛胸腺 DNA 的结合能力。通过 MTT 分析评估细胞毒性。通过琼脂糖凝胶电泳、8-氧鸟嘌呤和 γH2AX 染色分析超螺旋 DNA 的断裂,在细胞中分析 DNA 损伤。通过 DNA 凝聚/片段化、线粒体膜电位、Annexin V 染色和 caspase 3/7 活性检测凋亡。通过 DCFDA-和 GSSG/GSH-分析测定活性氧的形成。
DNA 的结合常数分别为 1.7×10(Cu(Sal-Gly)(phen))、2.5×10(Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine))和 3.2×10(Cu(Sal-Gly)(phepoxy))。所有化合物均诱导 DNA 损伤。凋亡是主要的细胞死亡形式。活性氧增加,这很可能是观察到的 DNA 损伤的原因。虽然这些化合物对所有测试的癌细胞系均具有细胞毒性,但只有 Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine)对非癌细胞的毒性显著降低,其相关表型与其他两种 Cu-配合物不同。因此,进一步使用定制的 RT-qPCR 阵列检测 Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine) 对药物治疗的分子变化。结果表明,Harakiri 明显上调。p53 的存在不是对 Cu 配合物反应中细胞凋亡所必需的。
这些 Cu-配合物,即 Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine),可能被认为是有前途的抗癌药物,即使在 p53 状态不足的情况下,在癌细胞中也具有活性。