McLaughlin Katie A, Sheridan Margaret A
Department of Psychology, University of Washington.
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016 Aug;25(4):239-245. doi: 10.1177/0963721416655883.
Children who have experienced environmental adversity-such as abuse, neglect, or poverty-are more likely to develop physical and mental health problems, perform poorly at school, and have difficulties in social relationships than children who have not encountered adversity. What is less clear is how and why adverse early experiences exert such a profound influence on children's development. Identifying developmental processes that are disrupted by adverse early environments is the key to developing better intervention strategies for children who have experienced adversity. Yet, much existing research relies on a cumulative risk approach that is unlikely to reveal these mechanisms. This approach tallies the number of distinct adversities experienced to create a risk score. This risk score fails to distinguish between distinct types of environmental experience, implicitly assuming that very different experiences influence development through the same underlying mechanisms. We advance an alternative model. This novel approach conceptualizes adversity along distinct dimensions, emphasizes the central role of learning mechanisms, and distinguishes between different forms of adversity that might influence learning in distinct ways. A key advantage of this approach is that learning mechanisms provide clear targets for interventions aimed at preventing negative developmental outcomes in children who have experienced adversity.
经历过环境逆境(如虐待、忽视或贫困)的儿童比未遭遇逆境的儿童更有可能出现身心健康问题、在学校表现不佳以及在社会关系中存在困难。目前尚不清楚的是,早期不良经历如何以及为何会对儿童的发展产生如此深远的影响。识别被早期不良环境破坏的发育过程是为经历过逆境的儿童制定更好干预策略的关键。然而,现有的许多研究依赖于累积风险方法,这种方法不太可能揭示这些机制。这种方法统计所经历的不同逆境的数量以创建一个风险评分。这个风险评分无法区分不同类型的环境经历,隐含地假设非常不同的经历通过相同的潜在机制影响发育。我们提出了一种替代模型。这种新方法从不同维度对逆境进行概念化,强调学习机制的核心作用,并区分可能以不同方式影响学习的不同形式的逆境。这种方法的一个优点是,学习机制为旨在防止经历过逆境的儿童出现负面发育结果的干预措施提供了明确的目标。