Kang Hyo-Jin, Chang Jung Min, Lee Joongyub, Song Sung Eun, Shin Sung Ui, Kim Won Hwa, Bae Min Sun, Moon Woo Kyung
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2042-2048. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance and radiation dose of single view cranio-caudal (CC) digital mammography (DM) plus mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) combined with synthesized mammography (SM) in comparison with two-view DM with or without DBT.
This study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from 130 women. Paired two-view DM and single MLO-DBT with SM images were acquired, and four independent retrospective reading sessions of different combinations of DM, SM and DBT were performed for the presence of malignant tumors using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operator curve (JAFROC) methods. The diagnostic performances and average glandular dose (AGD) were compared between different combinations of DM, SM and DBT.
Of 159 lesions in 130 patients, 27 were malignant. When using MLO-DBT with SM instead of MLO-DM, a significantly higher sensitivity (P=0.016) and specificity (P=0.012) were noted than with two-view DM, and comparable figure of merit (FOM), sensitivity, and specificity to two-view DM with DBT were noted. The mean AGD of CC-DM plus MLO-DBT with SM was 5.78mGy±1.06 per patient, which was significantly lower than that with two-view DM with MLO-DBT (8.45mGy±1.32; P <0.001) and slightly higher than that with two-view DM (5.30mGy±0.63).
The combined use of CC-DM plus MLO-DBT with SM showed higher sensitivity and specificity to two-view DM with a smaller AGD increment and comparable diagnostic performance to that of two-view DM with MLO-DBT with a significantly lower mean AGD.
评估单视角头尾位(CC)数字乳腺摄影(DM)加内外侧斜位(MLO)数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)联合合成乳腺摄影(SM)与有或无DBT的双视角DM相比的诊断性能和辐射剂量。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准,并获得130名女性的知情同意。采集配对的双视角DM和单视角MLO-DBT及SM图像,并使用留一法替代自由响应接收器操作曲线(JAFROC)方法对DM、SM和DBT的不同组合进行四次独立的回顾性读片,以检测恶性肿瘤的存在。比较DM、SM和DBT不同组合之间的诊断性能和平均腺体剂量(AGD)。
130例患者共159个病灶,其中27个为恶性。当使用MLO-DBT联合SM替代MLO-DM时,与双视角DM相比,敏感性(P = 0.016)和特异性(P = 0.012)显著更高,且与双视角DM联合DBT的品质因数(FOM)、敏感性和特异性相当。CC-DM加MLO-DBT联合SM时每位患者的平均AGD为5.78mGy±1.06,显著低于双视角DM联合MLO-DBT(8.45mGy±1.32;P <0.001),略高于双视角DM(5.30mGy±0.63)。
CC-DM加MLO-DBT联合SM对双视角DM显示出更高的敏感性和特异性,AGD增量更小,与双视角DM联合MLO-DBT的诊断性能相当,且平均AGD显著更低。