Suppr超能文献

用具有数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)图像的合成乳腺摄影(SM)取代单视图内外侧斜位(MLO)数字乳腺摄影(DM):与有或没有MLO-DBT的双视图DM的诊断性能和辐射剂量比较。

Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.

作者信息

Kang Hyo-Jin, Chang Jung Min, Lee Joongyub, Song Sung Eun, Shin Sung Ui, Kim Won Hwa, Bae Min Sun, Moon Woo Kyung

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 03080, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 03080, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2042-2048. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance and radiation dose of single view cranio-caudal (CC) digital mammography (DM) plus mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) combined with synthesized mammography (SM) in comparison with two-view DM with or without DBT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from 130 women. Paired two-view DM and single MLO-DBT with SM images were acquired, and four independent retrospective reading sessions of different combinations of DM, SM and DBT were performed for the presence of malignant tumors using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operator curve (JAFROC) methods. The diagnostic performances and average glandular dose (AGD) were compared between different combinations of DM, SM and DBT.

RESULTS

Of 159 lesions in 130 patients, 27 were malignant. When using MLO-DBT with SM instead of MLO-DM, a significantly higher sensitivity (P=0.016) and specificity (P=0.012) were noted than with two-view DM, and comparable figure of merit (FOM), sensitivity, and specificity to two-view DM with DBT were noted. The mean AGD of CC-DM plus MLO-DBT with SM was 5.78mGy±1.06 per patient, which was significantly lower than that with two-view DM with MLO-DBT (8.45mGy±1.32; P <0.001) and slightly higher than that with two-view DM (5.30mGy±0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of CC-DM plus MLO-DBT with SM showed higher sensitivity and specificity to two-view DM with a smaller AGD increment and comparable diagnostic performance to that of two-view DM with MLO-DBT with a significantly lower mean AGD.

摘要

目的

评估单视角头尾位(CC)数字乳腺摄影(DM)加内外侧斜位(MLO)数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)联合合成乳腺摄影(SM)与有或无DBT的双视角DM相比的诊断性能和辐射剂量。

材料与方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,并获得130名女性的知情同意。采集配对的双视角DM和单视角MLO-DBT及SM图像,并使用留一法替代自由响应接收器操作曲线(JAFROC)方法对DM、SM和DBT的不同组合进行四次独立的回顾性读片,以检测恶性肿瘤的存在。比较DM、SM和DBT不同组合之间的诊断性能和平均腺体剂量(AGD)。

结果

130例患者共159个病灶,其中27个为恶性。当使用MLO-DBT联合SM替代MLO-DM时,与双视角DM相比,敏感性(P = 0.016)和特异性(P = 0.012)显著更高,且与双视角DM联合DBT的品质因数(FOM)、敏感性和特异性相当。CC-DM加MLO-DBT联合SM时每位患者的平均AGD为5.78mGy±1.06,显著低于双视角DM联合MLO-DBT(8.45mGy±1.32;P <0.001),略高于双视角DM(5.30mGy±0.63)。

结论

CC-DM加MLO-DBT联合SM对双视角DM显示出更高的敏感性和特异性,AGD增量更小,与双视角DM联合MLO-DBT的诊断性能相当,且平均AGD显著更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验