Law Wai Lun, Foo Dominic C C
Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Laparoscopic rectal resection with total mesorectal excision is a technically challenging procedure, and there are limitations in conventional laparoscopy. A surgical robotic system may help to overcome some of the limitations. This study aimed to compare the short-term operative as well as oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic rectal resection.
This study was based on a prospectively collected database of patients with mid- to distal rectal cancer (up to 12 cm from the anal verge) undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection from January 2008 to June 2015. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative parameters and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Patient survival and recurrence were also compared.
During the study period, 171 and 220 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic rectal resection, respectively. The median age was 65 years (range 23-96). The median tumor distance was 8 and 7 cm from the anal verge in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.06). Significantly more male patients and more patients with comorbidities and preoperative radiation underwent robotic surgery. The median operating time for robotic resection was significantly longer, 260 versus 225 min (p < 0.001). Conversion rates of laparoscopic and robotic resection were 3.5 and 0.8 %, respectively (p = 0.308). The median hospital stay was 6 days in both groups (p = 0.29). There was no difference in the overall complication rate, but the incidence of urinary retention was significantly less in the robotic group (4.1 vs. 10.5 %, p = 0.024). With a median follow-up of 31 months, there was no difference in local recurrence, overall survival and disease-specific survival between the two groups.
In the treatment of mid- to low rectal cancer, robotic resection can achieve operative results and oncologic outcomes comparable to laparoscopic resection. The postoperative urinary retention rate is lower following robotic surgery.
腹腔镜直肠切除术加全直肠系膜切除术是一项技术要求较高的手术,传统腹腔镜手术存在局限性。手术机器人系统可能有助于克服其中一些局限性。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜和机器人直肠切除术的短期手术及肿瘤学结局。
本研究基于一个前瞻性收集的数据库,该数据库包含2008年1月至2015年6月期间接受腹腔镜或机器人低位前切除术的中低位直肠癌(距肛缘最多12 cm)患者。分析患者人口统计学、术中参数和短期结局数据。还比较了患者的生存率和复发情况。
在研究期间,分别有171例和220例连续患者接受了腹腔镜和机器人直肠切除术。中位年龄为65岁(范围23 - 96岁)。腹腔镜组和机器人组肿瘤距肛缘的中位距离分别为8 cm和7 cm(p = 0.06)。接受机器人手术的男性患者、合并症患者和术前接受放疗的患者明显更多。机器人切除术的中位手术时间明显更长,分别为260分钟和225分钟(p < 0.001)。腹腔镜和机器人切除术的中转率分别为3.5%和0.8%(p = 0.308)。两组的中位住院时间均为6天(p = 0.29)。总体并发症发生率无差异,但机器人组尿潴留的发生率明显更低(4.1%对10.5%,p = 0.024)。中位随访31个月,两组之间的局部复发、总生存率和疾病特异性生存率无差异。
在中低位直肠癌的治疗中,机器人切除术可获得与腹腔镜切除术相当的手术效果和肿瘤学结局。机器人手术后的术后尿潴留率较低。