Rus Rina R, Battelino Nina, Ponikvar Rafael, Premru Vladimir, Novljan Gregor
Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Children's hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ther Apher Dial. 2017 Feb;21(1):57-61. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12481. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
A central venous catheter (CVC) can either be inserted "de novo" or placed by guidewire exchange (GWE). From September 1998 to September 2015, 32 children (19 boys, 13 girls) were hemodialyzed in our unit by using a CVC. The mean age at CVC insertion was 12.6 ± 0.5 years. A total of 121 uncuffed catheters were placed, either "de novo" or by GWE in 64 (52.9%) and 57 (47.1%) cases, respectively. The most frequent cause for line revision was catheter dysfunction in 40/121 (33.1%) patients. The overall incidence of bacteremia was 1.5/1000 catheter-days. The incidence in newly inserted and GWE catheters was 1.4 and 1.7/1000 catheter-days, respectively. The difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.939). The infection rate correlated with patient age, and was higher in younger children (P = 0.006). GWE is an effective option of line revision, and did not influence the infection rate in our study.
中心静脉导管(CVC)可以“从头开始”插入,也可以通过导丝交换(GWE)放置。从1998年9月至2015年9月,我们科室使用CVC对32名儿童(19名男孩,13名女孩)进行了血液透析。CVC插入时的平均年龄为12.6±0.5岁。共放置了121根无袖套导管,其中“从头开始”插入64例(52.9%),通过GWE放置57例(47.1%)。最常见的管路更换原因是40/121例(33.1%)患者出现导管功能障碍。菌血症的总体发生率为1.5/1000导管日。新插入导管和GWE导管的发生率分别为1.4和1.7/1000导管日。差异无统计学意义(P = 0.939)。感染率与患者年龄相关,年幼儿童的感染率更高(P = 0.006)。在我们的研究中,GWE是一种有效的管路更换选择,且不影响感染率。