Suppr超能文献

肺癌的机器人辅助手术:现状与展望。

Robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer: State of the art and perspectives.

作者信息

Veronesi Giulia, Novellis Pierluigi, Voulaz Emanuele, Alloisio Marco

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Division, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy.

Thoracic Surgery Division, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2016 Nov;101:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

Abstract

The robotic surgical system is the result of a long process of development aimed at producing a natural extension of the surgeon's eyes and hands via the intermediation of a computer. In this way, the ease of movement obtained with open surgery is summated with the advantages of the minimally invasive technique. Since 2000, when the first robotic system for surgery was introduced, robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been adopted by an increasing number of centres around the world, and today is used in ∼10% of lobectomies in the US. Here, we review the characteristics and function of the robotic system available today (namely, Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System), outline the different techniques for major lung resection via RATS, compare RATS with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy, and speculate on future developments. To date, no randomized trials have reported comparative data on RATS vs. VATS/thoracotomy for lung cancer. Retrospective analysis comparing RATS vs. thoracotomy have revealed advantages for the former, especially shorter hospital stays and a lower complication rate, but RATS produces similar or only slightly better results to VATS, the two being minimally invasive techniques with no need for rib separation. A few studies have reported RATS to be safer than VATS, with less conversions for bleeding, less complications; in others, it was associated with lower postoperative consumption of pain killers and quicker return of patients to normal activity. In addition, lymphnode upstaging has been shown to be higher with RATS than with VATS, with a similar rate as thoracotomy. The main disadvantage of RATS is the higher costs of instrumentation. Nevertheless, the future will probably see reductions in the costs and improvements in the instrumentation, integration with 3D imaging to improve virtual reality, and more patients benefitting from minimally invasive procedures for lung malignancies.

摘要

机器人手术系统是一个漫长研发过程的成果,旨在通过计算机的媒介作用实现外科医生眼睛和双手的自然延伸。通过这种方式,开放手术所具备的操作灵活性与微创技术的优势得以结合。自2000年首个手术机器人系统问世以来,机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)已被全球越来越多的中心所采用,如今在美国约10%的肺叶切除术中得到应用。在此,我们回顾当今可用的机器人系统(即直观外科公司的达芬奇手术系统)的特点和功能,概述通过RATS进行主要肺切除的不同技术,将RATS与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)和开胸手术进行比较,并对未来发展进行推测。迄今为止,尚无随机试验报告RATS与VATS/开胸手术治疗肺癌的对比数据。比较RATS与开胸手术的回顾性分析显示前者具有优势,尤其是住院时间更短和并发症发生率更低,但RATS与VATS的结果相似或仅略优,二者均为无需肋骨分离的微创技术。一些研究报告称RATS比VATS更安全,出血导致的中转率更低,并发症更少;在其他研究中,它与术后止痛药使用量较低以及患者更快恢复正常活动相关。此外,已证明RATS的淋巴结分期上调高于VATS,与开胸手术的发生率相似。RATS的主要缺点是器械成本较高。尽管如此,未来器械成本可能会降低,器械会得到改进,与3D成像集成以改善虚拟现实,并且会有更多患者受益于肺癌的微创治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验