Peh Chao Xu, Abdin Edimansyah, Vaingankar Janhavi A, Verma Swapna, Chua Boon Yiang, Sagayadevan Vathsala, Seow Esmond, Zhang YunJue, Shahwan Shazana, Ng Li Ling, Prince Martin, Chong Siow Ann, Subramaniam Mythily
Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Early Psychosis Intervention Programme, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(2):823-833. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160575.
The latent variable δ has been proposed as a proxy for dementia. Previous validation studies have been conducted using convenience samples. It is currently unknown how δ performs in population-wide data.
To validate δ in Singapore using population-wide epidemiological study data on persons aged 60 and above.
δ was constructed using items from the Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI'D) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine δ model fit. Convergent validity was examined with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) and GMS-AGECAT dementia. Divergent validity was examined with GMS-AGECAT depression.
The δ model demonstrated fit to the data, χ2(df) = 249.71(55), p < 0.001, CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.997, RMSEA = 0.037. Latent variable δ was significantly associated with CDR and GMS-AGECAT dementia (range: β= 0.32 to 0.63), and was not associated with GMS-AGECAT depression. Compared to unadjusted models, δ model fit was poor when adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, and education.
The study found some support for δ as a proxy for dementia in Singapore based on population data. Both convergent and divergent validity were established. In addition, the δ model structure appeared to be influenced by age, gender, ethnicity, and education covariates.
潜在变量δ已被提议作为痴呆症的替代指标。先前的验证研究使用的是便利样本。目前尚不清楚δ在全人群数据中的表现如何。
利用新加坡60岁及以上人群的全人群流行病学研究数据验证δ。
δ由痴呆症社区筛查工具(CSI'D)和世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(WHODAS II)中的项目构建而成。进行验证性因子分析(CFA)以检验δ模型的拟合度。使用临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)和GMS-AGECAT痴呆症来检验收敛效度。使用GMS-AGECAT抑郁症来检验区分效度。
δ模型显示与数据拟合良好,χ2(自由度)=249.71(55),p<0.001,CFI=0.990,TLI=0.997,RMSEA=0.037。潜在变量δ与CDR和GMS-AGECAT痴呆症显著相关(范围:β=0.32至0.63),且与GMS-AGECAT抑郁症无关。与未调整模型相比,在对年龄、性别、种族和教育程度进行调整后,δ模型的拟合度较差。
该研究基于人群数据发现了一些支持δ作为新加坡痴呆症替代指标的证据。收敛效度和区分效度均已确立。此外,δ模型结构似乎受到年龄、性别、种族和教育协变量的影响。