Suppr超能文献

什么是对 REDD+ 的“社区认知”?对文献中如何引出和报告 REDD+ 认知的系统综述。

What Is a "Community Perception" of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature.

作者信息

Atmadja Stibniati S, Sills Erin O

机构信息

Forests and Human Well-Being, Center for International Forestry Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0155636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155636. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is expected to generate co-benefits and safeguard the interests of people who live in the forested regions where emissions are reduced. Participatory measurement, reporting and verification (PMRV) is one way to ensure that the interests of local people are represented in REDD+. In order to design and use PMRV systems to monitor co-benefits and safeguards, we need to obtain input on how local people perceive REDD+. In the literature, this is widely discussed as "community perceptions of REDD+." We systematically reviewed this literature to understand how these perceptions have been assessed, focusing specifically on how individual perceptions have been sampled and aggregated into "community perceptions." Using Google Scholar, we identified 19 publications that reported community perceptions of REDD+, including perceptions of its design, implementation, impacts, relationship with land tenure, and both interest and actual participation by local people. These perceptions were elicited through surveys of probability samples of the local population and interviews with purposively selected community representatives. Many authors did not provide sufficient information on their methods to interpret the reported community perceptions. For example, there was often insufficient detail on the selection of respondents or sampling methods. Authors also reported perceptions by unquantified magnitudes (e.g., "most people", "the majority") that were difficult to assess or compare across cases. Given this situation in the scholarly literature, we expect that there are even more severe problems in the voluminous gray literature on REDD+ not indexed by Google Scholar. We suggest that readers need to be cognizant of these issues and that publication outlets should establish guidelines for better reporting, requiring information on the reference population, sampling methods, and methods used to aggregate individual responses into "community perceptions."

摘要

减少毁林和森林退化所致排放(REDD+)预计将产生协同效益,并保障生活在减排森林地区的人们的利益。参与式测量、报告和核实(PMRV)是确保REDD+中体现当地人民利益的一种方式。为了设计和使用PMRV系统来监测协同效益和保障措施,我们需要了解当地人对REDD+的看法。在文献中,这被广泛讨论为“社区对REDD+的看法”。我们系统地回顾了这一文献,以了解这些看法是如何被评估的,特别关注个人看法是如何被抽样并汇总为“社区看法”的。我们通过谷歌学术搜索,确定了19篇报告社区对REDD+看法的出版物,包括对其设计、实施、影响、与土地保有权的关系以及当地人的利益和实际参与情况的看法。这些看法是通过对当地人口概率样本的调查以及对有目的地挑选的社区代表的访谈得出的。许多作者没有提供足够的方法信息来解释所报告的社区看法。例如,关于受访者的选择或抽样方法往往细节不足。作者还报告了难以评估或在不同案例间比较的未量化程度的看法(例如,“大多数人”、“多数”)。鉴于学术文献中的这种情况,我们预计在谷歌学术未索引的大量关于REDD+的灰色文献中存在更严重的问题。我们建议读者需要认识到这些问题,并且出版机构应制定更好报告的指南,要求提供关于参考人群、抽样方法以及将个人回答汇总为“社区看法”所用方法的信息。

相似文献

2
Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0157826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157826. eCollection 2016.
4
Considering land tenure in REDD+ participatory measurement, reporting, and verification: A case study from Indonesia.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0167943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167943. eCollection 2017.
5
Pathways of REDD+ Piloting in Enhancing Sustainable Forest Management: The Case of Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem, Western Tanzania.
Environ Manage. 2023 Jan;71(1):55-73. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01627-6. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
6
The feasibility of local participation in Measuring, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) for REDD.
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176897. eCollection 2017.
7
Land use, REDD+ and the status of wildlife populations in Yaeda Valley, northern Tanzania.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214823. eCollection 2019.
8
Avoiding re-inventing the wheel in a people-centered approach to REDD+.
Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1380-93. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12301. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
10
An assessment of the impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their community forests in Nepal.
J Environ Manage. 2014 Apr 1;136:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Community perception towards mental health problems in Ethiopia: a mixed-method narrative synthesis.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06047-w.
2
The feasibility of local participation in Measuring, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) for REDD.
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176897. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验