Gopaluni Seerapani, Sherif Mohamed, Ahmadouk Naim A
Department of Nephrology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK, CB2 0QQ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD010690. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010690.pub2.
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is defined as the spontaneous movement of the limbs (mainly legs) associated with unpleasant, sometimes painful sensation which is relieved by moving the affected limb. Prevalence of RLS among people on dialysis has been estimated between 6.6% and 80%. RLS symptoms contribute to impaired quality of life and people with RLS are shown to have increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.Various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been used to treat primary RLS. However, the evidence for use of these interventions in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well established. The agents used in the treatment of primary RLS may be limited by the side effects in people with CKD due to increased comorbidity and altered drug pharmacokinetics.
The aim of this review was to critically look at the benefits, efficacy and safety of various treatment options used in the treatment of RLS in people with CKD and those undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). We aimed to define different group characteristics based on CKD stage to assess the applicability of a particular intervention to an individual patient.
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 12 January 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-RCTs that assessed the efficacy of an intervention for RLS in adults with CKD were eligible for inclusion. Studies investigating idiopathic RLS or RLS secondary to other causes were excluded.
Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and conducted risk of bias evaluation. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.
We included nine studies enrolling 220 dialysis participants. Seven studies were deemed to have moderate to high risk of bias. All studies were small in size and had a short follow-up period (two to six months). Studies evaluated the effects of six different interventions against placebo or standard treatment. The interventions studied included aerobic resistance exercise, gabapentin, ropinirole, levodopa, iron dextran, and vitamins C and E (individually and in combination).Aerobic resistance exercise showed a significant reduction in severity of RLS compared to no exercise (2 studies, 48 participants: MD -7.56, 95% CI -14.20 to -0.93; I = 65%), and when compared to exercise with no resistance (1 study, 24 participants: MD -11.10, 95% CI -17.11 to -5.09), however there was no significant reduction when compared to ropinirole (1 study, 22 participants): MD -0.55, 95% CI -6.41 to 5.31). There were no significant differences between aerobic resistance exercise and either no exercise or ropinirole in the physical or mental component summary scores (using the SF-36 form). Improvement in sleep quality varied. There was no significant difference in subjective sleep quality between exercise and no exercise; however one study reported a significant improvement with ropinirole compared to resistance exercise (MD 3.71, 95% CI 0.89 to 6.53). Using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale there were no significant differences between resistance exercise and no exercise, ropinirole, or exercise with no resistance. Two studies reported there were no adverse events and one study did not mention if there were any adverse events. In one study, one patient in each group dropped out but the reason for dropout was not reported. Two studies reported no adverse events and one study did not report adverse events.Gabapentin was associated with reduced RLS severity when compared to placebo or levodopa, and there was a significant improvement in sleep quality, latency and disturbance reported in one study when compared to levodopa. Three patients dropped out due to lethargy (2 patients), and drowsiness, syncope and fatigue (1 patient).Because of a short duration of action, rebound and augmentation were noted with levodopa treatment even though it conferred some benefit in reducing the symptoms of RLS. Reported adverse events were severe vomiting, agitation after caffeine intake, headaches, dry mouth, and gastrointestinal symptoms.One study (25 participants) reported iron dextran reduced the severity of RLS at weeks one and two, but not at week four. Vitamins C, E and C plus E (1 study, 60 participants) helped the symptoms of RLS with minimal side effects (nausea and dyspepsia) but more evidence is needed before any conclusions can be drawn.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the small size of the studies and short follow-up, it can only be concluded that pharmacological interventions and intra-dialytic exercise programs have uncertain effects on RLS in haemodialysis patients. There have been no studies performed in non-dialysis CKD, peritoneal dialysis patients, or kidney transplant recipients. Further studies are warranted before any conclusions can be drawn. Aerobic resistance exercise and ropinirole may be suitable interventions for further evaluation.
不宁腿综合征(RLS)被定义为肢体(主要是腿部)的自发运动,伴有不愉快的、有时是疼痛的感觉,通过移动受影响的肢体可缓解。据估计,透析患者中RLS的患病率在6.6%至80%之间。RLS症状会导致生活质量受损,且RLS患者的心血管发病率和死亡率有所增加。各种药物和非药物干预措施已被用于治疗原发性RLS。然而,这些干预措施在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中应用的证据并不充分。由于合并症增加和药物药代动力学改变,用于治疗原发性RLS的药物可能会受到CKD患者副作用的限制。
本综述的目的是批判性地审视用于治疗CKD患者和接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT)患者RLS的各种治疗选择的益处、疗效和安全性。我们旨在根据CKD分期定义不同的组特征,以评估特定干预措施对个体患者的适用性。
我们通过与信息专家联系,使用与本综述相关的检索词,检索了截至2016年1月12日的Cochrane肾脏与移植专业注册库。
评估干预措施对成年CKD患者RLS疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验符合纳入标准。排除调查特发性RLS或继发于其他原因的RLS的研究。
两位作者独立评估研究的纳入资格并进行偏倚风险评估。结果以二分结果的风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)表示,以连续结果的均值差(MD)和95%CI表示。
我们纳入了9项研究,共220名透析参与者。7项研究被认为存在中度至高偏倚风险。所有研究规模较小,随访期较短(2至6个月)。研究评估了6种不同干预措施对比安慰剂或标准治疗的效果。所研究的干预措施包括有氧抗阻运动、加巴喷丁、罗匹尼罗、左旋多巴、右旋糖酐铁以及维生素C和E(单独使用及联合使用)。与不运动相比,有氧抗阻运动使RLS严重程度显著降低(2项研究,48名参与者:MD -7.56,95%CI -14.20至-0.93;I² = 65%),与无抗阻运动相比也显著降低(1项研究,24名参与者:MD -11.10,95%CI -17.11至-5.09),但与罗匹尼罗相比无显著降低(1项研究,22名参与者):MD -0.55,95%CI -6.41至5.31)。在身体或精神成分汇总评分(使用SF-36量表)方面,有氧抗阻运动与不运动或罗匹尼罗之间无显著差异。睡眠质量的改善情况各异。运动与不运动之间主观睡眠质量无显著差异;然而,一项研究报告称,与抗阻运动相比,罗匹尼罗使睡眠质量有显著改善(MD 3.71,95%CI 0.89至6.53)。使用爱泼华嗜睡量表,抗阻运动与不运动、罗匹尼罗或无抗阻运动之间无显著差异。两项研究报告无不良事件,一项研究未提及是否有任何不良事件。在一项研究中,每组有一名患者退出,但未报告退出原因。两项研究报告无不良事件,一项研究未报告不良事件。与安慰剂或左旋多巴相比,加巴喷丁使RLS严重程度降低,且一项研究报告称,与左旋多巴相比,睡眠质量、入睡潜伏期和睡眠障碍有显著改善。3名患者因嗜睡(2例)、嗜睡、晕厥和疲劳(1例)退出。尽管左旋多巴在减轻RLS症状方面有一定益处,但因其作用持续时间短,观察到有反跳和症状加重现象。报告的不良事件有严重呕吐、摄入咖啡因后烦躁、头痛、口干和胃肠道症状。一项研究(25名参与者)报告,右旋糖酐铁在第1周和第2周降低了RLS严重程度,但在第4周未降低。维生素C、E以及维生素C加E(1项研究,60名参与者)对RLS症状有帮助,副作用最小(恶心和消化不良),但在得出任何结论之前还需要更多证据。
鉴于研究规模小且随访期短,只能得出结论,药物干预和透析内运动项目对血液透析患者的RLS影响不确定。尚未在非透析CKD患者、腹膜透析患者或肾移植受者中进行研究。在得出任何结论之前,有必要进行进一步研究。有氧抗阻运动和罗匹尼罗可能是适合进一步评估的干预措施。