Smith Karen, Weeks Susan
1. Texas Christian University Center for Evidence Based Practice and Research: A Collaborating Center of The Joanna Briggs Institute.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4610-4621. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-429.
REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence on the impact of pre-injury anticoagulation therapy in the older adult patient who experiences a traumatic brain injury.
Trauma in the elderly remains one of the most challenging problems for healthcare providers in the 21 century. The most recent United States (U.S.) census estimates that by the year 2020 more than 52 million Americans will be age 65 years or older, and one million of those will live to be over 100 years of age. In the older adult population, classified as age 65 years or greater, the two leading causes of injury were reported as motor vehicle crashes (MVC) and falls. We have become increasingly aware of the unique physiologic changes in this population that make them more susceptible to succumb to traumatic injuries than their younger counterparts. This is especially true in the anticoagulated patient with a traumatic brain injury.Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as an injury occurring when an external force traumatizes the brain. It may also be known as an intracranial or head injury. TBI is classified depending on the mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating), severity, and location of the assault. Damage to the brain, skull, and/or scalp transpires. TBI is the leading cause of death and disability in the U.S, and persons of all ages, races, ethnicities, and incomes are affected. In the past five to ten years, trauma services have recorded an increase in major trauma admissions of patients age 65 years and older. In review of the literature to date, it is recognized that outcomes following moderate to severe TBI in older adults are poor, with high rates of significant disability and mortality reported. A recent Australian study reported that 28% of older adults died in the hospital following a TBI and in Finland adults aged 75 years and older had the highest rates of TBI related hospitalizations and death. According to a systematic review of European studies, the overall incidence of hospitalized TBI patients was 235 incidents/per 100,000 individuals, with a mortality rate of 15.4 deaths/per 100,000 of the population.The association between medications that alter a patient's coagulation function and adverse trauma outcome continues to be an important area of interest and study. The percentage of Americans on anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents continues to increase with the long-term trend towards longer life expectancies. Older adults are prescribed anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents to prevent thromboembolic complications of artial fibrillation; prosthetic cardiac valves; cerebral, coronary, and peripheral vascular disease; as well as several other medical conditions. One of the most frequently prescribed anticoagulant medications is warfarin. The prevalence of warfarin use in the Unites States is unknown, but the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) estimates that more than 31 million prescriptions were written in 2004. Newer, more potent antiplatelet medications like clopidogrel (Plavix) pose an even greater risk for uncontrolled bleeding in trauma patients. The uncertainty regarding the impact on trauma outcomes is compounded by the variable response of patients to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication for an associated comorbidity. Evidence suggests that outcomes for TBI are worse, and there may be delayed intracranial hemorrhage in this population of patients.According to a Western Australian study, trauma patients are theoretically at risk for prolonged major bleeding. Studies of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) suggest that patients taking anticoagulants have two to six times greater mortality. Mina et al. noted that the trauma patient with preinjury anticoagulation such as warfarin or even aspirin who had an intracranial injury had a four to five fold higher risk of death than the non-anticoagulated patient. Franko et al. concluded that mortality of patients over age 70 was significantly higher than that of younger patients when taking preinjury anticoagulants. The concern about unfavourable outcomes in the anticoagulated older adult patient presenting with traumatic injury has led many healthcare systems to take action. Ivascu et al. looked at early identification in triage for at- risk patients, and implemented warfarin (coumadin) protocols to assist in promoting improved patient outcomes; however, her research did not demonstrate a positive impact. In an effort to find a relationship between preinjury anticoagulation and outcomes in the older adult trauma patient, the degree of anticoagulation rather than the anticoagulant itself was studied to assist with predicting the severity of the TBI. Pieracci et al. concluded that among older adult patients who have sustained a head injury, warfarin use with an admission International Normalized Ratio (INR) greater than or equal to two was associated with an increase severity of TBI, a trend toward an increased likelihood of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), increased overall mortality, and increased mortality after ICH.The impact of trauma- related morbidity and mortality in the elderly population is significant. Older adult patients account for 25% of trauma related hospital costs, 25% of trauma-related deaths, have the highest age-specific rate of TBI, and have worse outcomes reported. Fortuna et al. concluded that preinjury anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications used by the older adult patient were not associated with increased mortality, but age was a significant predictor of mortality. Research by Wojcik et al., concluded that preinjury anticoagulation therapy did not adversely impact mortality or length of stay (LOS) outcomes in the head injured patients.The influence of anticoagulation on outcomes in the older adult patient with a head injury has been studied, and has resulted in significant debate. Chronic use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications in the management of many medical conditions has increased over the decades. As a consequence, older adults over the age of 65 are at risk for trauma related injuries. Concomitant risks include bleeding after traumatic injury.What is known nationally and internationally is our population is aging. With an aging population comes acute and chronic illness. Anticoagulant medication is frequently prescribed for health conditions to promote positive patient outcomes. We know the impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy may have detrimental effects; especially when an older adult experiences a traumatic brain injury. What we don't know about the impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy is how it effects the trauma patient, how to rapidly and successful reverse the detrimental outcomes, and how to prevent mortality in this specific age group. A systematic review of the literature will synthesize the data, identify gaps, and recommend on-going research related to the impact of untoward outcomes in the older adult, anticoagulated, trauma patient.Theoutcome to be studied is mortality prior to discharge from the healthcare system. The gaps in the literature, timeliness of research, and change in demographic data justifies a systematic review of the literature to assist in providing consensus to base practice change, policy advances, and protocol development to promote positive patient outcomesPrior to the commencement of the review, a search of the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Library of Systematic Reviews, and MEDLINE was performed. No systematic reviews of the proposed topic were located.
综述问题/目标:本系统综述的目的是综合现有最佳证据,以探讨伤前抗凝治疗对老年创伤性脑损伤患者的影响。
老年人创伤仍然是21世纪医疗服务提供者面临的最具挑战性的问题之一。美国最新的人口普查估计,到2020年,超过5200万美国人将年满65岁或以上,其中100万人将活到100岁以上。在65岁及以上的老年人群中,受伤的两个主要原因据报道是机动车碰撞(MVC)和跌倒。我们越来越意识到这一人群中独特的生理变化,这使得他们比年轻同龄人更容易因创伤性损伤而死亡。在患有创伤性脑损伤的抗凝患者中尤其如此。创伤性脑损伤(TBI)定义为外力创伤大脑时发生的损伤。它也可能被称为颅内或头部损伤。TBI根据损伤机制(钝性或穿透性)、严重程度和攻击部位进行分类。大脑、颅骨和/或头皮会受到损伤。TBI是美国死亡和残疾的主要原因,所有年龄、种族、民族和收入的人都受到影响。在过去五到十年中,创伤服务机构记录到65岁及以上患者的重大创伤入院人数有所增加。在回顾迄今为止的文献时,人们认识到老年患者中度至重度TBI后的预后很差,报告的严重残疾和死亡率很高。最近一项澳大利亚研究报告称,28%的老年患者在TBI后死于医院,在芬兰,75岁及以上的成年人TBI相关住院率和死亡率最高。根据对欧洲研究的系统综述,住院TBI患者的总体发病率为每10万人235例,死亡率为每10万人15.4人。改变患者凝血功能的药物与不良创伤结局之间的关联仍然是一个重要的研究领域。随着预期寿命延长的长期趋势,服用抗凝剂和抗血小板药物的美国人比例持续增加。老年人被开抗凝剂和抗血小板药物以预防房颤、人工心脏瓣膜、脑、冠状动脉和外周血管疾病以及其他几种疾病的血栓栓塞并发症。最常开具的抗凝药物之一是华法林。美国华法林的使用 prevalence 尚不清楚,但美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)估计2004年开出了超过3100万张处方。更新、更有效的抗血小板药物如氯吡格雷(波立维)对创伤患者的失控出血构成更大风险。患者对抗凝或抗血小板药物治疗合并症的可变反应加剧了对创伤结局影响的不确定性。有证据表明,TBI患者的预后更差,并且该人群患者可能会出现延迟性颅内出血。根据西澳大利亚的一项研究,创伤患者理论上有发生长时间大出血的风险。对创伤性颅内出血(ICH)的研究表明,服用抗凝剂的患者死亡率高出两到六倍。米纳等人指出,伤前服用华法林甚至阿司匹林等抗凝剂的颅内损伤创伤患者死亡风险比未抗凝患者高四到五倍。弗兰科等人得出结论,70岁以上患者在服用伤前抗凝剂时死亡率明显高于年轻患者。对抗凝老年创伤患者出现不利结局的担忧促使许多医疗系统采取行动。伊瓦斯库等人研究了在分诊时对高危患者的早期识别,并实施了华法林(香豆素)方案以协助改善患者结局;然而,她的研究并未显示出积极影响。为了找出伤前抗凝与老年创伤患者结局之间的关系,研究了抗凝程度而非抗凝剂本身,以协助预测TBI的严重程度。皮耶拉奇等人得出结论,在遭受头部损伤的老年患者中,入院国际标准化比值(INR)大于或等于2的华法林使用与TBI严重程度增加、颅内出血(ICH)可能性增加的趋势、总体死亡率增加以及ICH后死亡率增加有关。创伤相关的发病率和死亡率对老年人群的影响很大。老年患者占创伤相关医院费用的25%,创伤相关死亡的25%,TBI的年龄特异性发病率最高,并且报告的结局更差。福尔图纳等人得出结论,老年患者使用伤前抗凝剂和抗血小板药物与死亡率增加无关,但年龄是死亡率的重要预测因素。沃伊西克等人的研究得出结论,伤前抗凝治疗对头部受伤患者的死亡率或住院时间(LOS)结局没有不利影响。抗凝对老年头部受伤患者结局的影响已经得到研究,并引发了重大争论。几十年来,在许多疾病的管理中,抗凝剂和抗血小板药物的长期使用有所增加。因此,65岁以上的老年人有遭受创伤相关损伤的风险。伴随风险包括创伤后出血。在国内和国际上我们都知道我们的人口正在老龄化。随着人口老龄化,急性和慢性疾病随之而来。抗凝药物经常被开用于健康状况以促进患者获得积极结局。我们知道抗凝和抗血小板治疗的影响可能有有害作用;特别是当老年人遭受创伤性脑损伤时。我们不知道抗凝和抗血小板治疗的影响是如何影响创伤患者的,如何快速且成功地扭转不利结局,以及如何预防这个特定年龄组的死亡率。对文献的系统综述将综合数据、识别差距,并推荐与老年、抗凝、创伤患者不良结局影响相关的持续研究。待研究的结局是从医疗系统出院前的死亡率。文献中的差距、研究的及时性以及人口统计数据的变化证明有必要对文献进行系统综述,以协助提供共识,为实践改变、政策推进和方案制定提供依据,以促进患者获得积极结局。在综述开始之前,对Cochrane系统评价图书馆、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)系统评价图书馆和MEDLINE进行了检索。未找到关于该主题的系统综述。