Gandhi Mihir, Choo Su Pin, Thng Choon Hua, Tan Say Beng, Low Albert Su Chong, Cheow Peng Chung, Goh Anthony Soon Whatt, Tay Kiang Hiong, Lo Richard Hoau Gong, Goh Brian Kim Poh, Wong Jen San, Ng David Chee Eng, Soo Khee Chee, Liew Wei Ming, Chow Pierce K H
Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, #02-01, Nanos, 31 Biopolis Way, Singapore, Singapore.
Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, Singapore.
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2868-y.
Approximately 20 % of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients diagnosed in the early stages may benefit from potentially curative ablative therapies such as surgical resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. For patients not eligible for such options, prognosis is poor. Sorafenib and Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) are clinically proven treatment options in patients with unresectable HCC, and this study aims to assess overall survival following either SIRT or Sorafenib therapy for locally advanced HCC patients.
This investigator-initiated, multi-centre, open-label, randomized, controlled trial will enrol 360 patients with locally advanced HCC, as defined by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or stage C, without distant metastases, and which is not amenable to immediate curative treatment. Exclusion criteria include previous systemic therapy, metastatic disease, complete occlusion of the main portal vein, or a Child-Pugh score of >7. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 and stratified by centre and presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis to receive either a single administration of SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres®, Sirtex Medical Limited, Sydney, Australia) targeted at HCC in the liver by the trans-arterial route or continuous oral Sorafenib (Nexavar®, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) at a dose of 400 mg twice daily until disease progression, no further response, complete regression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients for both the Sorafenib and SIRT arms will be followed-up every 4 weeks for the first 3 months and 12 weekly thereafter. Overall survival is the primary endpoint, assessed for the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints are tumour response rate, time-to-tumour progression, progression free survival, quality of life and down-staging to receive potentially curative therapy.
Definitive data comparing these two therapies will help to determine clinical practice in the large group of patients with locally advanced HCC and improve outcomes for such patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01135056 , first received 24, May 2010.
约20%早期诊断的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者可能从潜在的根治性消融治疗中获益,如手术切除、移植或射频消融。对于不适合这些治疗方案的患者,预后较差。索拉非尼和选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)是不可切除HCC患者经临床验证的治疗选择,本研究旨在评估局部晚期HCC患者接受SIRT或索拉非尼治疗后的总生存期。
本研究者发起的多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验将纳入360例局部晚期HCC患者,根据巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期为B期或C期,无远处转移且不适合立即进行根治性治疗。排除标准包括既往全身治疗、转移性疾病、主门静脉完全闭塞或Child-Pugh评分>7。符合条件的患者将按1:1随机分组,并按中心以及有无门静脉血栓形成进行分层,分别经动脉途径接受一次使用钇-90树脂微球(SIR-Spheres®,Sirtex Medical Limited,悉尼,澳大利亚)靶向肝脏HCC的SIRT治疗,或每日两次口服400mg索拉非尼(Nexavar®,Bayer Pharma AG,柏林,德国)直至疾病进展、不再有反应、完全缓解或出现不可接受的毒性。索拉非尼组和SIRT组患者在最初3个月内每4周随访一次,此后每周随访一次。总生存期是主要终点,对意向性治疗人群进行评估。次要终点包括肿瘤反应率、至肿瘤进展时间、无进展生存期、生活质量以及降期以接受潜在的根治性治疗。
比较这两种治疗方法的确切数据将有助于确定大量局部晚期HCC患者的临床实践,并改善这些患者的治疗结果。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT01135056,首次接收时间为2010年5月24日。