Frishman W H, Garofalo J L, Rothschild A, Rothschild M, Greenberg S M, Soberman J
Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461.
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 19;64(11):65F-69F. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90749-2.
As the number of antihypertensive agents increases, the choice of optimal therapy becomes more difficult. Certainly, hemodynamic derangements caused by the disease state as well as therapy must be considered. Patient convenience and quality of life are also issues that must be addressed. Preliminary experience suggests that the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) push-pull osmotic pump formulation of nifedipine is safe and efficacious in the treatment of hypertension. In 1 study, nifedipine GITS was compared with sustained-release propranolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension already receiving diuretics. Using a 2-week placebo run-in, double-blind study design, patients were randomly assigned to receive nifedipine GITS (n = 31) in doses of 30, 60 or 90 mg once daily, or sustained-release propranolol (n = 32) in doses of 80, 160 or 240 mg once daily. Previous diuretic therapy was continued. Sitting and 5-minute standing blood pressure and heart rate measurements were obtained 24 hours after dosing. At the end point of treatment, both nifedipine GITS and sustained-release propranolol reduced blood pressure compared with placebo (p less than 0.001) in the sitting and standing positions. Nifedipine GITS was more effective than sustained-release propranolol in reducing standing (p less than 0.005) and sitting (p less than 0.001) systolic blood pressure and sitting diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.02). Sustained-release propranolol caused a greater reduction in standing (p less than 0.001) and sitting (p less than 0.0006) resting heart rate than nifedipine GITS. Both drugs were well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
随着抗高血压药物种类的增加,选择最佳治疗方案变得更加困难。当然,必须考虑疾病状态以及治疗所引起的血流动力学紊乱。患者的便利性和生活质量也是必须解决的问题。初步经验表明,硝苯地平的胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)推挽式渗透泵制剂在治疗高血压方面是安全有效的。在一项研究中,将硝苯地平GITS与缓释普萘洛尔在已接受利尿剂治疗的轻至中度高血压患者中进行比较。采用为期2周的安慰剂导入、双盲研究设计,患者被随机分配接受每日一次剂量为30、60或90毫克的硝苯地平GITS(n = 31),或每日一次剂量为80、160或240毫克的缓释普萘洛尔(n = 32)。继续之前的利尿剂治疗。给药24小时后测量坐位和站立5分钟时的血压和心率。在治疗终点,与安慰剂相比,硝苯地平GITS和缓释普萘洛尔在坐位和站立位均降低了血压(p小于0.001)。硝苯地平GITS在降低站立位(p小于0.005)和坐位(p小于0.001)收缩压以及坐位舒张压(p小于0.02)方面比缓释普萘洛尔更有效。缓释普萘洛尔在降低站立位(p小于0.001)和坐位(p小于0.0006)静息心率方面比硝苯地平GITS降低得更多。两种药物耐受性均良好。(摘要截短于250字)