Welsh Robert C, Roe Matthew T, Steg Philippe Gabriel, James Stefan, Povsic Thomas J, Bode Christoph, Gibson Charles Michael, Ohman Erik Magnus
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC.
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
Aspirin was established more than a quarter century ago as an evidence-based therapy to reduce recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease based on limited data by contemporary standards. Indeed it is unclear how regulatory agencies would define the optimal dose or duration of aspirin therapy if assessed in the current era. Subsequent clinical investigation has focused on the addition of antithrombotic agents on top of baseline aspirin therapy in the acute and chronic setting to reduce patient's risk of further ischemic events, at the cost of increased bleeding complications. The current armamentarium of potent and predictable antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents has ushered in a new era where clinicians and scientists are contemplating withdrawal of previously established agents to minimize bleeding risk while sustaining efficacy; indeed, subtraction may lead to the next advance in the treatment of acute and chronic ischemic vascular disease.
二十多年前,阿司匹林就已成为一种循证疗法,用于降低冠心病患者复发性心血管事件的风险,不过按照当代标准,当时的数据有限。事实上,如果在当前时代进行评估,监管机构如何界定阿司匹林治疗的最佳剂量或疗程尚不清楚。随后的临床研究聚焦于在急性和慢性情况下,在基线阿司匹林治疗基础上加用抗血栓药物,以降低患者发生进一步缺血事件的风险,但代价是出血并发症增加。当前一系列强效且可预测的抗血小板和抗血栓药物开创了一个新时代,临床医生和科学家正在考虑停用先前已确立的药物,以在维持疗效的同时将出血风险降至最低;实际上,减法运算可能会引领急慢性缺血性血管疾病治疗取得下一个进展。