Patterson Addie, Almeida Leonardo, Hess Christopher W, Martinez-Ramirez Daniel, Okun Michael S, Rodriguez Ramon L, Rundle-Gonzalez Valerie, Wagle Shukla Aparna, Malaty Irene A
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2016 Nov 3;6:379. doi: 10.7916/D8GB24C5. eCollection 2016.
The aim was to compare the occurrence of post-injection dysphagia in parkinsonism-related cervical dystonia (PRCD) versus cervical dystonia (CD) of other etiologies (non-PRCD). A secondary objective was to explore potential clinical differences between PRCD and non-PRCD and their respective responses to botulinum toxin (BoNT).
A cross-sectional chart review was carried out of patients treated for CD with Onabotulinumtoxin A at the University of Florida. We collected demographic information, dose of BoNT injected, patient-reported presence of dysphagia as a side effect, patient-perceived duration of benefit and efficacy according to the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS).
Of the 144 patients included, 24 patients were diagnosed with PRCD and 120 were diagnosed as non-PRCD. Data analysis showed no significant differences in number of weeks of benefit from BoNT (PRCD 9.1±3.7 versus non-PRCD 9.4±3.7 weeks, p = 0.830), BoNT dosage (PRCD 235.0±95.6 versus non-PRCD 263.7±101.3 units, p = 0.181), median CGIS score (median = 2 or "much improved" for both groups, p = 0.88), or the presence of dysphagia after BoNT (PRCD 17% versus non-PRCD 19 %, p = 0.753, n = 132). In a subgroup analysis of the non-PRCD group, patients who experienced dysphagia were older than those who did not (63.9±8.9 years versus 58.1±14.4 years, p = 0.02).
Despite an increased baseline risk of dysphagia in patients with PRCD, BoNT appears to be equally safe and equally beneficial in PRCD and non-PRCD patients.
目的是比较帕金森病相关性颈部肌张力障碍(PRCD)与其他病因的颈部肌张力障碍(CD,非PRCD)注射后吞咽困难的发生率。次要目的是探讨PRCD和非PRCD之间潜在的临床差异及其对肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT)的各自反应。
对在佛罗里达大学接受A型肉毒毒素治疗的CD患者进行横断面图表回顾。我们收集了人口统计学信息、注射的BoNT剂量、患者报告的作为副作用的吞咽困难情况、患者感知的受益持续时间以及根据临床总体印象量表(CGIS)评估的疗效。
在纳入的144例患者中,24例被诊断为PRCD,120例被诊断为非PRCD。数据分析显示,BoNT治疗的受益周数(PRCD为9.1±3.7周,非PRCD为9.4±3.7周,p = 0.830)、BoNT剂量(PRCD为235.0±95.6单位,非PRCD为263.7±101.3单位,p = 0.181)、CGIS评分中位数(两组中位数均为2或“明显改善”,p = 0.88)或BoNT治疗后吞咽困难的发生率(PRCD为17%,非PRCD为19%,p = 0.753,n = 132)均无显著差异。在非PRCD组的亚组分析中,出现吞咽困难的患者比未出现吞咽困难的患者年龄更大(63.9±8.9岁对58.1±14.4岁,p = 0.02)。
尽管PRCD患者吞咽困难的基线风险增加,但BoNT在PRCD和非PRCD患者中似乎同样安全且同样有益。