Suppr超能文献

在为期10年(2005 - 2014年)的美国肩肘外科医师学会开放和封闭年会上所展示的临床证据水平。

Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005-2014).

作者信息

Kay Jeffrey, Memon Muzammil, de Sa Darren, Simunovic Nicole, Athwal George S, Bedi Asheesh, Ayeni Olufemi R

机构信息

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, 4E15, Hamilton, L8N 3Z5, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Nov 14;17(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1334-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) annual scientific meetings are premier forums whereby orthopaedic surgeons are informed of the latest research advances in shoulder and elbow surgery. The purpose of the present study was to assess the Level of evidence (LOE) in the clinical papers presented at both the open and closed ASES annual scientific meetings from 2005 to 2014. Secondarily, the study evaluated whether there were any changes in the distribution of LOE over this period of time.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently evaluated the abstracts of 532 paper presentations at either the open or closed ASES annual meetings. The independent reviewers first screened the abstracts for clinical evidence and excluded cadaveric, biomechanical, technique, and review studies. The included abstracts were then independently graded for methodological quality using LOE from Level I (highest quality) to IV (lowest quality) based on the classification system created by The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

RESULTS

Overall, 421 presentations were included and graded for LOE. In general, 17% of the presentations were graded level I; 15% level II; 25% level III; and 43% assigned a LOE of IV. Chi-square analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the LOE of presentations at the open and closed ASES meetings combined (p = 0.028) between the years 2005 and 2014. In particular, the proportion of presentations graded as level IV significantly decreased over this period (p = <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While most presentations at the ASES annual scientific meetings were of lower LOEs the percentage of level I evidence is greater than that reported at other Orthopaedic meetings. There has been a significant improvement in the LOE of clinical research at open and closed ASES meetings from 2005 to 2014. Specifically, the proportion of level IV studies have dramatically decreased over time.

摘要

背景

美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)年度科学会议是主要论坛,骨科医生可借此了解肩肘外科的最新研究进展。本研究的目的是评估2005年至2014年ASES年度科学会议公开和非公开会议上发表的临床论文的证据水平(LOE)。其次,该研究评估了这段时间内证据水平的分布是否有任何变化。

方法

两名评审员独立评估了ASES年度公开或非公开会议上532篇论文报告的摘要。独立评审员首先筛选摘要以获取临床证据,并排除尸体、生物力学、技术和综述研究。然后,根据美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)创建的分类系统,使用从I级(最高质量)到IV级(最低质量)的证据水平对纳入的摘要进行独立的方法学质量分级。

结果

总体而言,421篇报告被纳入并进行了证据水平分级。一般来说,17%的报告被评为I级;15%为II级;25%为III级;43%的证据水平为IV级。卡方分析表明,2005年至2014年期间,ASES公开和非公开会议上报告的证据水平有统计学上的显著提高(p = 0.028)。特别是,在此期间被评为IV级的报告比例显著下降(p = <0.001)。

结论

虽然ASES年度科学会议上的大多数报告证据水平较低,但I级证据的百分比高于其他骨科会议报告的百分比。2005年至2014年,ASES公开和非公开会议上临床研究的证据水平有显著提高。具体而言,随着时间的推移,IV级研究的比例大幅下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd8c/5109803/10b5c55c936e/12891_2016_1334_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验