Kümler Iben, Knoop Ann S, Jessing Christina A R, Ejlertsen Bent, Nielsen Dorte L
Department of Oncology , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Department of Oncology , Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
ESMO Open. 2016 Aug 16;1(4):e000062. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000062. eCollection 2016.
Endocrine therapy constitutes a central modality in the treatment of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced breast cancer.
To evaluate the evidence for endocrine treatment in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer focusing on the aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane and fulvestrant.
A review was carried out using PubMed. Randomised phase II and III trials reporting on ≥100 patients were included.
35 trials met the inclusion criteria. If not used in the adjuvant setting, a non-steroid aromatase inhibitor was the optimal first-line option. In general, the efficacy of the different aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant was similar in tamoxifen-refractory patients. A randomised phase II trial of palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone showed significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with endocrine therapy alone in the first-line setting (20.2 vs 10.2 months). Furthermore, the addition of everolimus to exemestane in the Breast Cancer Trials of OraL EveROlimus-2 (BOLERO-2) study resulted in an extension of median PFS by 4.5 months after recurrence/progression on a non-steroid aromatase inhibitor. However, overall survival was not significantly increased.
Conventional treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant may be an adequate treatment option for most patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibition might represent substantial advances for selected patients in some specific settings. However, there is an urgent need for prospective biomarker-driven trials to identify patients for whom these treatments are cost-effective.
内分泌治疗是雌激素受体(ER)阳性晚期乳腺癌治疗的核心方式。
评估绝经后晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗的证据,重点关注芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑、阿那曲唑、依西美坦和氟维司群。
使用PubMed进行综述。纳入报告≥100例患者的随机II期和III期试验。
35项试验符合纳入标准。若未用于辅助治疗,非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂是最佳一线选择。总体而言,在他莫昔芬难治性患者中,不同芳香化酶抑制剂和氟维司群的疗效相似。一项关于哌柏西利联合来曲唑与单纯来曲唑的随机II期试验显示,在一线治疗中,与单纯内分泌治疗相比,无进展生存期(PFS)显著延长(20.2个月对10.2个月)。此外,在奥拉帕利联合依维莫司-2(BOLERO-2)乳腺癌试验中,在非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂复发/进展后,依维莫司联合依西美坦可使中位PFS延长4.5个月。然而,总生存期未显著增加。
对于大多数激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者,常规使用芳香化酶抑制剂或氟维司群治疗可能是一种合适的治疗选择。在某些特定情况下,抑制哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)可能为部分患者带来显著进展。然而,迫切需要前瞻性生物标志物驱动的试验,以确定这些治疗具有成本效益的患者。