Welvaert Marijke, Caley Peter
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia ; Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, Australia.
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 28;5(1):1890. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3583-5. eCollection 2016.
Citizen science and crowdsourcing have been emerging as methods to collect data for surveillance and/or monitoring activities. They could be gathered under the overarching term . The discipline, however, still struggles to be widely accepted in the scientific community, mainly because these activities are not embedded in a quantitative framework. This results in an ongoing discussion on how to analyze and make useful inference from these data. When considering the data collection process, we illustrate how citizen surveillance can be classified according to the nature of the underlying observation process measured in two dimensions-the degree of observer reporting intention and the control in observer detection effort. By classifying the observation process in these dimensions we distinguish between crowdsourcing, unstructured citizen science and structured citizen science. This classification helps the determine data processing and statistical treatment of these data for making inference. Using our framework, it is apparent that published studies are overwhelmingly associated with structured citizen science, and there are well developed statistical methods for the resulting data. In contrast, methods for making useful inference from purely crowd-sourced data remain under development, with the challenges of accounting for the unknown observation process considerable. Our quantitative framework for citizen surveillance calls for an integration of citizen science and crowdsourcing and provides a way forward to solve the statistical challenges inherent to citizen-sourced data.
公民科学和众包已成为为监测和/或监控活动收集数据的方法。它们可以归入一个总括性术语之下。然而,这一学科在科学界仍难以被广泛接受,主要是因为这些活动没有融入定量框架。这导致了关于如何分析这些数据并从中做出有用推断的持续讨论。在考虑数据收集过程时,我们阐述了如何根据在两个维度上衡量的潜在观察过程的性质对公民监测进行分类——观察者报告意图的程度和观察者检测努力中的控制。通过在这些维度上对观察过程进行分类,我们区分了众包、非结构化公民科学和结构化公民科学。这种分类有助于确定对这些数据进行处理和统计分析以进行推断。使用我们的框架可以明显看出,已发表的研究绝大多数与结构化公民科学相关,并且对于由此产生的数据有完善的统计方法。相比之下,从纯粹众包数据中做出有用推断的方法仍在发展中,考虑未知观察过程的挑战相当大。我们的公民监测定量框架要求将公民科学和众包整合起来,并为解决公民来源数据固有的统计挑战提供了一条前进的道路。