McBurnett Keith, Clemow David, Williams David, Villodas Miguel, Wietecha Linda, Barkley Russell
1 Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Francisco , San Francisco, California.
2 Lilly USA, LLC , Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Feb;27(1):38-42. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0115. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
To evaluate effects of atomoxetine versus placebo on sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) and determine factors affecting improvement of SCT in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with dyslexia (ADHD+D) or dyslexia only.
This is a post hoc analysis of a 16-week placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized phase of a previously reported atomoxetine study in children aged 10-16 years with ADHD+D, Dyslexia-only, or ADHD-only (no placebo arm). Least squares mean changes from baseline to endpoint for atomoxetine versus placebo on the Kiddie-Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Interview (K-SCT) (Parent, Teacher, and Youth) were analyzed using analysis of covariance and multiple regression (partial R) analyses to test contributions of ADHD and dyslexia to improvements in K-SCT scores.
Results were examined for the three informants within the three diagnostic groups (nine outcomes). Atomoxetine treatment was associated with significant reductions from baseline in seven of the nine outcomes using the p = 0.05 significance level, appropriate for exploratory analysis. When change in ADHD symptom severity was controlled, all of the seven SCT outcomes remained significant; changes in effect sizes were minimal. Regression analyses using SCT change as the criterion found a significant contribution by inattention change only for parent report, whereas, baseline SCT severity was a significant predictor in the randomized groups with the exception of teacher report in the Dyslexia-only group.
Given that controlling for change in ADHD symptoms had little effect on change in SCT scores, findings suggest that change in SCT is substantially independent of change in ADHD. By inference, SCT and its response to treatment is a partially distinct phenomenon from ADHD response. Regression analyses did not reveal global effects of inattention change on SCT change; instead, baseline SCT severity was the strongest predictor of placebo-controlled treatment effect on SCT. Atomoxetine effects on SCT appear to be best predicted by how much room for improvement exists for SCT rather than by severity or improvement in inattention.
NCT00607919, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
评估托莫西汀与安慰剂对迟缓认知节奏(SCT)的影响,并确定影响患有阅读障碍(ADHD+D)或仅患有阅读障碍的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童SCT改善的因素。
这是一项对先前报道的托莫西汀研究中10至16岁患有ADHD+D、仅患有阅读障碍或仅患有ADHD(无安慰剂组)儿童进行的为期16周的安慰剂对照、双盲随机阶段的事后分析。使用协方差分析和多元回归(偏R)分析来检验ADHD和阅读障碍对儿童迟缓认知节奏访谈(K-SCT)(家长、教师和青少年)中托莫西汀与安慰剂从基线到终点的最小二乘均值变化,以测试ADHD和阅读障碍对K-SCT分数改善的贡献。
对三个诊断组内的三位信息提供者的结果进行了检查(九个结果)。使用p = 0.05的显著性水平(适用于探索性分析),在九个结果中的七个结果中,托莫西汀治疗与基线相比有显著降低。当控制ADHD症状严重程度的变化时,所有七个SCT结果仍然显著;效应大小的变化最小。以SCT变化为标准的回归分析发现,仅在家长报告中,注意力不集中的变化有显著贡献,而在随机分组中,除仅患有阅读障碍组的教师报告外,基线SCT严重程度是一个显著的预测因素。
鉴于控制ADHD症状的变化对SCT分数的变化影响很小,研究结果表明SCT的变化在很大程度上独立于ADHD的变化。由此推断,SCT及其对治疗的反应与ADHD的反应是部分不同的现象。回归分析未揭示注意力不集中变化对SCT变化的整体影响;相反,基线SCT严重程度是安慰剂对照治疗对SCT效果的最强预测因素。托莫西汀对SCT的影响似乎最好通过SCT有多大的改善空间来预测,而不是通过注意力不集中的严重程度或改善情况来预测。
NCT00607919,www.clinicaltrials.gov。