NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.180. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
Threats to wild and managed insect pollinators in Europe are cause for both ecological and socio-economic concern. Multiple anthropogenic pressures may be exacerbating pollinator declines. One key pressure is exposure to chemicals including pesticides and other contaminants. Historically the honey bee (Apis mellifera spp.) has been used as an 'indicator' species for 'standard' ecotoxicological testing but it has been suggested that it is not always a good proxy for other types of eusocial and solitary bees because of species differences in autecology and sensitivity to various stressors. We developed a common toxicity test system to conduct acute and chronic exposures of up to 240h of similar doses of seven chemicals, targeting different metabolic pathways, on three bee species (Apis mellifera spp., Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis). We compared the relative sensitivity between species in terms of potency between the chemicals and the influence of exposure time on toxicity. While there were significant interspecific differences that varied through time, overall the magnitude of these differences (in terms of treatment effect ratios) was generally comparable (<2 fold) although there were some large divergences from this pattern. Our results suggest that A. mellifera spp. could be used as a proxy for other bee species provided a reasonable assessment factor is used to cover interspecific variation. Perhaps more importantly our results show significant and large time dependency of toxicity across all three tested species that greatly exceeds species differences (>25 fold within test). These are rarely considered in standard regulatory testing but may have severe environmental consequences, especially when coupled with the likelihood of differential species exposures in the wild. These insights indicate that further work is required to understand how differences in toxicokinetics vary between species and mixtures of chemicals.
在欧洲,野生和管理的昆虫传粉媒介受到威胁,这不仅引起了生态关注,也引起了社会经济关注。多种人为压力可能会加剧传粉媒介的减少。一个关键的压力是接触化学物质,包括农药和其他污染物。历史上,蜜蜂(Apis mellifera spp.)被用作“指示”物种,用于“标准”生态毒理学测试,但有人认为,由于物种在自身生态学和对各种胁迫因素的敏感性方面存在差异,它并不总是其他类型的群居和独居蜜蜂的良好替代品。我们开发了一种通用毒性测试系统,对三种蜜蜂物种(Apis mellifera spp.、Bombus terrestris 和 Osmia bicornis)进行了长达 240 小时的急性和慢性暴露,暴露于七种不同代谢途径的化学物质,剂量相似。我们比较了物种间的相对敏感性,即化学物质之间的效力和暴露时间对毒性的影响。虽然种间存在显著差异,且随时间变化,但总体而言,这些差异的幅度(以处理效应比表示)通常相当(<2 倍),尽管有些差异很大。我们的结果表明,只要使用合理的评估因子来涵盖种间差异,Apis mellifera spp. 就可以作为其他蜜蜂物种的替代品。也许更重要的是,我们的结果表明,所有三种受测试物种的毒性都存在显著的、很大的时间依赖性,这大大超过了种间差异(在测试内>25 倍)。这些在标准监管测试中很少考虑,但可能会产生严重的环境后果,尤其是当与野外中不同物种的暴露可能性相结合时。这些发现表明,需要进一步研究以了解不同物种之间以及化学物质混合物的毒代动力学差异。