Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 6;6(10):e012153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012153.
Psychological support programmes are not currently funded for people with a history of melanoma. A major barrier to the implementation of effective psychological interventions in routine clinical care is a lack of cost-effectiveness data. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention for people with a history of melanoma who are at high risk of developing new primary disease.
The economic evaluation is a within-trial analysis to evaluate the incremental costs and health outcomes of a psychoeducational intervention compared to usual care from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be conducted, providing estimates of the cost to reduce fear of melanoma recurrence and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Fear of melanoma recurrence will be measured using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory and preference-based quality of life measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) instrument. The AQoL-8D will provide utilities for estimation of QALYs in the cost-utility analysis. Unit costs of health services and medicines will be taken from the Medicare Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme national databases. Health outcomes, and health service and medication use will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up. The within-trial analysis will be conducted at 12 months, consistent with the end point of the trial.
Approval to conduct the study was granted by the Sydney Local Health District (RPAH zone) Ethics Review Committee (X13-0065 and HREC/13/RPAH/86), the Department of Health and Ageing Human Research Ethics Committee (21/2013), the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2013/595), and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Ethics Committee (EO 2013/4/58).
ACTRN12613000304730; Pre-results.
目前,针对有黑色素瘤病史的人群,并未提供心理支持计划。在常规临床护理中实施有效心理干预的主要障碍是缺乏成本效益数据。本文描述了一项针对高复发风险黑色素瘤患者的心理教育干预的随机对照试验的计划经济评估。
该经济评估是一项基于试验的分析,旨在从澳大利亚医疗保健系统的角度评估心理教育干预相对于常规护理的增量成本和健康结果。将进行成本效益和成本效用分析,提供降低对黑色素瘤复发恐惧的成本和每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本的估计值。使用癌症复发恐惧量表(Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory)测量对黑色素瘤复发的恐惧,使用生活质量评估-8 维度量表(AQoL-8D)测量偏好基础的生活质量。AQoL-8D 将为成本效用分析中的 QALY 估计提供效用。卫生服务和药物的单位成本将取自医疗保险福利计划和药品福利计划国家数据库。将在基线、6 个月和 12 个月随访时收集健康结果、卫生服务和药物使用情况。基于试验的分析将在 12 个月时进行,与试验终点一致。
悉尼地方卫生区(RPAH 区)伦理审查委员会(X13-0065 和 HREC/13/RPAH/86)、澳大利亚卫生部和老龄部人类伦理委员会(21/2013)、悉尼大学人类伦理委员会(2013/595)和澳大利亚卫生福利伦理委员会(EO 2013/4/58)已批准开展该研究。
ACTRN12613000304730;预结果。