Buccini Gabriela Dos Santos, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Paulino Larissa Munari, Araújo Clarice Lopes, Venancio Sonia Isoyama
Program in Nutrition in Public Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jul;13(3). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12384. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
Identifying modifiable risk factor for exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) interruption is key for improving child health globally. There is no consensus about the effect of pacifier use on EBF interruption. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the association between pacifier use and EBF interruption during the first six month. A search of CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS and Medline; from inception through 30 December 2014 without restriction of language yielded 1,866 publications (PROSPERO protocol CRD42014014527). Predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria peer reviewed yielded 46 studies: two clinical trials, 20 longitudinal, and 24 cross-sectional studies. Meta-analysis was performed and meta-regression explored heterogeneity across studies. The pooled effect of the association between pacifier use and EBF interruption was 2.48 OR (95% CI = 2.16-2.85). Heterogeneity was explained by the study design (40.2%), followed by differences in the measurement and categorization of pacifier use, the methodological quality of the studies and the socio-economic context. Two RCT's with very limited external validity found a null association, but 44 observational studies, including 20 prospective cohort studies, did find a consistent association between pacifier use and risk of EBF interruption (OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.78-2.93). Our findings support the current WHO recommendation on pacifier use as it focuses on the risk of poor breastfeeding outcomes as a result of pacifier use. Future studies that take into account the risks and benefits of pacifier use are needed to clarify this recommendation.
确定纯母乳喂养(EBF)中断的可改变风险因素是改善全球儿童健康的关键。关于使用安抚奶嘴对纯母乳喂养中断的影响尚无共识。因此,本系统评价的目的是调查在婴儿出生后的前六个月内使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养中断之间的关联。检索了CINAHL、Scopus、科学网、LILACS和Medline数据库;从建库至2014年12月31日,不限语言,共获得1866篇出版物(PROSPERO协议编号CRD42014014527)。经过同行评审,根据预先确定的纳入/排除标准,最终纳入46项研究:两项临床试验、20项纵向研究和24项横断面研究。进行了荟萃分析,并通过元回归探讨了各研究间的异质性。使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养中断之间关联的合并效应值为2.48(比值比)(95%置信区间=2.16 - 2.85)。异质性的原因包括研究设计(40.2%),其次是安抚奶嘴使用的测量和分类差异、研究的方法学质量以及社会经济背景。两项外部效度非常有限的随机对照试验未发现关联,但44项观察性研究,包括20项前瞻性队列研究,确实发现使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养中断风险之间存在一致关联(比值比=2.28;95%置信区间=1.78 - 2.93)。我们的研究结果支持世界卫生组织目前关于使用安抚奶嘴的建议,因为该建议关注了因使用安抚奶嘴导致母乳喂养效果不佳的风险。未来需要开展考虑使用安抚奶嘴的风险和益处的研究,以阐明这一建议。