Suppr超能文献

使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养的中断:系统评价与荟萃分析

Pacifier use and interruption of exclusive breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Buccini Gabriela Dos Santos, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Paulino Larissa Munari, Araújo Clarice Lopes, Venancio Sonia Isoyama

机构信息

Program in Nutrition in Public Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jul;13(3). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12384. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

Abstract

Identifying modifiable risk factor for exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) interruption is key for improving child health globally. There is no consensus about the effect of pacifier use on EBF interruption. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the association between pacifier use and EBF interruption during the first six month. A search of CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS and Medline; from inception through 30 December 2014 without restriction of language yielded 1,866 publications (PROSPERO protocol CRD42014014527). Predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria peer reviewed yielded 46 studies: two clinical trials, 20 longitudinal, and 24 cross-sectional studies. Meta-analysis was performed and meta-regression explored heterogeneity across studies. The pooled effect of the association between pacifier use and EBF interruption was 2.48 OR (95% CI = 2.16-2.85). Heterogeneity was explained by the study design (40.2%), followed by differences in the measurement and categorization of pacifier use, the methodological quality of the studies and the socio-economic context. Two RCT's with very limited external validity found a null association, but 44 observational studies, including 20 prospective cohort studies, did find a consistent association between pacifier use and risk of EBF interruption (OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.78-2.93). Our findings support the current WHO recommendation on pacifier use as it focuses on the risk of poor breastfeeding outcomes as a result of pacifier use. Future studies that take into account the risks and benefits of pacifier use are needed to clarify this recommendation.

摘要

确定纯母乳喂养(EBF)中断的可改变风险因素是改善全球儿童健康的关键。关于使用安抚奶嘴对纯母乳喂养中断的影响尚无共识。因此,本系统评价的目的是调查在婴儿出生后的前六个月内使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养中断之间的关联。检索了CINAHL、Scopus、科学网、LILACS和Medline数据库;从建库至2014年12月31日,不限语言,共获得1866篇出版物(PROSPERO协议编号CRD42014014527)。经过同行评审,根据预先确定的纳入/排除标准,最终纳入46项研究:两项临床试验、20项纵向研究和24项横断面研究。进行了荟萃分析,并通过元回归探讨了各研究间的异质性。使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养中断之间关联的合并效应值为2.48(比值比)(95%置信区间=2.16 - 2.85)。异质性的原因包括研究设计(40.2%),其次是安抚奶嘴使用的测量和分类差异、研究的方法学质量以及社会经济背景。两项外部效度非常有限的随机对照试验未发现关联,但44项观察性研究,包括20项前瞻性队列研究,确实发现使用安抚奶嘴与纯母乳喂养中断风险之间存在一致关联(比值比=2.28;95%置信区间=1.78 - 2.93)。我们的研究结果支持世界卫生组织目前关于使用安抚奶嘴的建议,因为该建议关注了因使用安抚奶嘴导致母乳喂养效果不佳的风险。未来需要开展考虑使用安抚奶嘴的风险和益处的研究,以阐明这一建议。

相似文献

1
Pacifier use and interruption of exclusive breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jul;13(3). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12384. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
2
Pacifiers and breastfeeding: a systematic review.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Apr;163(4):378-82. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.578.
3
Supervised dosing with a long-acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD011983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011983.pub2.
5
Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD003517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.
6
Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):CD003188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003188.pub4.
7
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.

引用本文的文献

2
Pacifier Usage Among Saudi Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;13(15):1935. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151935.
5
Impact of intrapartum oxytocin administration on neonatal sucking behavior and breastfeeding.
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 11;14(1):5859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56635-9.
6
The effects of prolonged pacifier use on language development in infants and toddlers.
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 20;15:1349323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349323. eCollection 2024.
8
Exclusive breastfeeding abandonment in adolescent mothers: a cohort study within health primary services.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022 Nov 7;30(spe):e3786. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6252.3786. eCollection 2022.
9
Determinants of the interruption of exclusive breastfeeding at the 30th day after birth.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022 Jun 10;40:e2021096. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2021096IN. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review.
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Jul;12(3):402-17. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12294. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
2
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
3
Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life in Brazil: a systematic review.
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005971. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
4
Influence of the support offered to breastfeeding by maternity hospitals.
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005354. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
5
Summarising the health effects of breastfeeding.
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):1-2. doi: 10.1111/apa.13136.
6
Pacifier Use and Exclusive Breastfeeding in Brazil.
J Hum Lact. 2016 Aug;32(3):NP52-60. doi: 10.1177/0890334415609611. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
Breastfeeding and asthma and allergies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):38-53. doi: 10.1111/apa.13132.
10
Effect of breastfeeding on malocclusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):54-61. doi: 10.1111/apa.13103.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验