Rubin Gideon James, Harper Sarah, Williams Paolo Diaz, Öström Sanna, Bredbere Samantha, Amlôt Richard, Greenberg Neil
Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK;
Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016 Nov 17;7:30933. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.30933. eCollection 2016.
Responding to health crises overseas can be both rewarding and distressing for staff involved.
We interviewed UK staff involved in the 2014/15 Ebola response to identify experiences that positively or negatively affected them.
We conducted qualitative telephone interviews with 30 Public Health England (PHE) staff and 21 non-governmental organisation (NGO) staff who had deployed to West Africa.
The main motivations for deploying were for moral reasons and personal development. Families were largely supportive of deployment, although family tension was apparent. Pre-deployment training was largely viewed positively. Common stressors included dealing with death and suffering as well as concerns about contagion, while uplifting aspects included seeing patients improve and receiving thanks from community members. Communications with home were largely satisfactory, although participants commonly self-censored their communication. Inter-organisational tensions caused stress, particularly for PHE staff hosted by NGOs. After deployment, loss of motivation and being avoided by friends and family were common.
Highlighting the personal benefits arising from deployments, as well as their moral value, may help to increase volunteering. Efforts to improve the support given to responders should focus on identifying how to better support families, preparing all staff members for dealing with death and the risk of contagion, providing opportunities for staff to more frequently experience the uplifting aspects of deployment, resolving inter-organisational difficulties, and educating others about the low risk posed by responders on their return.
对参与其中的工作人员而言,应对海外健康危机既有益处,也令人苦恼。
我们采访了参与2014/15年埃博拉应对行动的英国工作人员,以确定对他们产生积极或消极影响的经历。
我们对30名部署到西非的英国公共卫生署(PHE)工作人员和21名非政府组织(NGO)工作人员进行了定性电话访谈。
部署的主要动机是出于道德原因和个人发展。尽管家庭关系紧张明显,但家人大多支持部署。部署前培训总体上得到积极评价。常见的压力源包括应对死亡和苦难以及对感染的担忧,而令人振奋的方面包括看到患者病情好转以及得到社区成员的感谢。与国内的沟通总体令人满意,尽管参与者通常会对自己的交流进行自我审查。组织间的紧张关系造成了压力,特别是对由非政府组织接待的英国公共卫生署工作人员而言。部署后,动力丧失以及被朋友和家人回避的情况很常见。
强调部署带来的个人益处及其道德价值,可能有助于增加志愿服务。改善对应急人员支持的努力应集中在确定如何更好地支持家庭、让所有工作人员做好应对死亡和感染风险的准备、为工作人员提供更多机会更频繁地体验部署中令人振奋的方面、解决组织间的困难,以及向他人宣传应急人员回国后带来的低风险。