Suppr超能文献

一项关于未覆盖双裸金属支架与单裸金属支架治疗恶性胆管梗阻疗效的前瞻性随机研究。

A prospective randomized study for efficacy of an uncovered double bare metal stent compared to a single bare metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction.

作者信息

Lee Hyun Jik, Chung Moon Jae, Park Jeong Yup, Park Seung Woo, Nam Chung Mo, Song Si Young, Bang Seungmin

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3159-3167. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5341-8. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A biliary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is commonly used to relieve malignant biliary obstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a conventional uncovered SEMS with that of a newly developed uncovered double bare metal stent in reducing the risk of stent occlusion caused by tumor ingrowth.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, open-labeled, randomized trial in 71 patients at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine from June 2013 to June 2014. Patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction were included and randomized to receive an uncovered single bare metal stent (SBSs; S&G Biotech Inc.), an uncovered single bare metal stent (SBSt; Taewoong Medical), or an uncovered double bare metal stent (DBS; S&G Biotech Inc.).

RESULTS

The mean age was 66.6 years (range, 35-83), and 42 (59.2%) were male. The mean duration of stent patency was 212 days (±152) in the DBS group (n = 24) compared with 124 days (±98) in the SBSs group (n = 23; P = 0.022 for noninferiority) and 116 days (±79) in the SBSt group (n = 24; P = 0.010 for noninferiority). There were no differences in the incidences of early and delayed complications or migration.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly developed DBS is noninferior to the conventional uncovered SEMSs on duration of stent patency and tumor ingrowth occurred less frequently in the DBS group. This might decrease the need for reintervention and offer a better quality of life. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01869894.

摘要

背景与目的

胆道自膨式金属支架(SEMS)常用于缓解恶性胆道梗阻。本研究旨在比较传统裸支架与新开发的裸双层金属支架在降低肿瘤长入导致支架闭塞风险方面的疗效。

患者与方法

2013年6月至2014年6月,我们在延世大学医学院Severance医院对71例患者进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机试验。纳入无法手术的恶性胆道梗阻患者,并随机分为接受裸单金属支架(SBSs;S&G Biotech Inc.)、裸单金属支架(SBSt;Taewoong Medical)或裸双层金属支架(DBS;S&G Biotech Inc.)。

结果

平均年龄为66.6岁(范围35 - 83岁),男性42例(59.2%)。DBS组(n = 24)支架通畅的平均持续时间为212天(±152),SBSs组(n = 23)为124天(±98)(非劣效性P = 0.022),SBSt组(n = 24)为116天(±79)(非劣效性P = 0.010)。早期和延迟并发症或移位的发生率无差异。

结论

新开发的DBS在支架通畅持续时间方面不劣于传统裸SEMS,且DBS组肿瘤长入的发生率较低。这可能减少再次干预的需求并提供更好的生活质量。该试验已在Clinicaltrials.gov注册,编号:NCT01869894。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验