Choi Seo-Young, Kim Hyo-Jung, Kim Ji-Soo
Department of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Kyungdong University, Goseong, Republic of Korea.
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Dec 15;371:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.063. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
Diagnosis of combined peripheral and central vestibulopathy remains a challenge since the findings from peripheral vestibular involvements may overshadow those from central vestibular disorders or vice versa. The aim of this study was to enhance detection of these intriguing disorders by characterizing the clinical features and underlying etiologies. We had recruited 55 patients with combined peripheral and central vestibulopathy at the Dizziness Clinic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2013. Peripheral vestibular involvement was determined by decreased caloric responses in either ear, and central vestibulopathy was diagnosed with obvious central vestibular signs or the lesions documented on MRIs to involve the central vestibular structures. Combined peripheral and central vestibulopathy could be classified into four types according to the patterns of vestibular presentation. Infarctions were the most common cause of acute unilateral cases while cerebellopontine angle tumors were mostly found in chronic unilateral ones. Wernicke encephalopathy and degenerative disorders were common in acute and chronic bilateral disorders. Twenty five (45.5%) patients showed only vestibular findings with or without auditory involvements, but association with gaze-evoked nystagmus, impaired smooth pursuit or central types of head shaking nystagmus indicated a central vestibular involvement in most of them (23/25, 92.0%). Given the requirements for urgent treatments and potentially grave prognosis of combined vestibulopathy, central signs should be sought even in patients with clinical or laboratory features of peripheral vestibulopathy. Scrutinized bedside evaluation, however, secured the diagnosis in almost all the patients with combined vestibulopathy.
诊断外周性和中枢性联合前庭病变仍然是一项挑战,因为外周前庭受累的表现可能会掩盖中枢前庭疾病的表现,反之亦然。本研究的目的是通过描述临床特征和潜在病因来加强对这些复杂疾病的检测。2003年至2013年期间,我们在首尔国立大学盆唐医院头晕门诊招募了55例外周性和中枢性联合前庭病变患者。外周前庭受累通过任一耳朵的冷热试验反应降低来确定,中枢前庭病变通过明显的中枢前庭体征或MRI记录的累及中枢前庭结构的病变来诊断。外周性和中枢性联合前庭病变可根据前庭表现模式分为四种类型。梗死是急性单侧病例最常见的原因,而桥小脑角肿瘤多见于慢性单侧病例。韦尼克脑病和退行性疾病在急性和慢性双侧疾病中很常见。25例(45.5%)患者仅表现出前庭症状,伴或不伴有听觉受累,但伴有凝视诱发性眼球震颤、平稳跟踪受损或中枢型摇头性眼球震颤表明其中大多数(23/25,92.0%)存在中枢前庭受累。鉴于联合前庭病变的紧急治疗需求和潜在的严重预后,即使在外周前庭病变的临床或实验室特征患者中也应寻找中枢体征。然而,仔细的床边评估几乎可以确诊所有联合前庭病变患者。