Blay Eddie, Hewitt D Brock, Chung Jeanette W, Biester Thomas, Fiore James F, Dahlke Allison R, Quinn Christopher M, Lewis Frank R, Bilimoria Karl Y
Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery and Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Feb;224(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.042. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Concerns persist about the effect of current duty hour reforms on resident educational outcomes. We investigated whether a flexible, less-restrictive duty hour policy (Flexible Policy) was associated with differential general surgery examination performance compared with current ACGME duty hour policy (Standard Policy).
We obtained examination scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, Qualifying Examination (written boards), and Certifying Examination (oral boards) for residents in 117 general surgery residency programs that participated in the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial. Using bivariate analyses and regression models, we compared resident examination performance across study arms (Flexible Policy vs Standard Policy) for 2015 and 2016, and 1 year of the Qualifying Examination and Certifying Examination. Adjusted analyses accounted for program-level factors, including the stratification variable for randomization.
In 2016, FIRST trial participants were 4,363 general surgery residents. Mean American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores for residents were not significantly different between study groups (Flexible Policy vs Standard Policy) overall (Flexible Policy: mean [SD] 502.6 [100.9] vs Standard Policy: 502.7 [98.6]; p = 0.98) or for any individual postgraduate year level. There was no difference in pass rates between study arms for either the Qualifying Examination (Flexible Policy: 90.4% vs Standard Policy: 90.5%; p = 0.99) or Certifying Examination (Flexible Policy: 86.3% vs Standard Policy: 88.6%; p = 0.24). Results from adjusted analyses were consistent with these findings.
Flexible, less-restrictive duty hour policies were not associated with differences in general surgery resident performance on examinations during the FIRST Trial. However, more years under flexible duty hour policies might be needed to observe an effect.
当前的工作时长改革对住院医师教育成果的影响仍备受关注。我们调查了与美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)现行工作时长政策(标准政策)相比,灵活、限制较少的工作时长政策(灵活政策)是否与普通外科考试成绩的差异有关。
我们获取了参与外科住院医师工作时长要求灵活性(FIRST)试验的117个普通外科住院医师培训项目中住院医师的美国外科委员会在培考试、资格考试(笔试)和认证考试(口试)的成绩。使用双变量分析和回归模型,我们比较了2015年和2016年各研究组(灵活政策组与标准政策组)以及资格考试和认证考试1年期间住院医师的考试成绩。校正分析考虑了项目层面的因素,包括随机分组的分层变量。
2016年,FIRST试验参与者为4363名普通外科住院医师。总体上,各研究组(灵活政策组与标准政策组)住院医师的美国外科委员会在培考试平均成绩无显著差异(灵活政策组:均值[标准差]502.6[100.9],标准政策组:502.7[98.6];p = 0.98),任何一个研究生年级水平的成绩也无显著差异。资格考试(灵活政策组:90.4%,标准政策组:90.5%;p = 0.99)或认证考试(灵活政策组:86.3%,标准政策组:88.6%;p = 0.24)各研究组的通过率也无差异。校正分析结果与这些发现一致。
在FIRST试验期间,灵活、限制较少的工作时长政策与普通外科住院医师考试成绩的差异无关。然而,可能需要在灵活工作时长政策下观察更多年才能看到效果。