Suppr超能文献

伴有和不伴有鼓膜造孔管的鼓膜切开术治疗慢性分泌性中耳炎。

Myringotomy with and without tympanostomy tubes for chronic otitis media with effusion.

作者信息

Mandel E M, Rockette H E, Bluestone C D, Paradise J L, Nozza R J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pa.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Oct;115(10):1217-24. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860340071020.

Abstract

We studied 109 children with otitis media with effusion of 2 months' duration or longer that was unresponsive to medical management. Eighty-six subjects who had neither "significant" hearing loss nor defined symptoms were randomly assigned to receive myringotomy, myringotomy with tympanostomy tube insertion, or no surgery, and 23 subjects with significant hearing loss, defined symptoms, or both were randomly assigned to receive either myringotomy or myringotomy with tube insertion. Myringotomy with tube insertion provided more disease-free time and better hearing than either myringotomy alone or no surgery; however, some subjects who underwent myringotomy with tube insertion developed otorrhea or persistent perforation of the tympanic membrane. Myringotomy offered no advantage over no surgery regarding percent of time with middle-ear effusion, number of acute otitis media episodes, and number of subsequent surgical procedures. These results may not properly be extrapolated to less severely affected children.

摘要

我们研究了109名患有积液性中耳炎且病程持续2个月或更长时间、对药物治疗无反应的儿童。86名既没有“显著”听力损失也没有明确症状的受试者被随机分配接受鼓膜切开术、鼓膜切开术加置管或不进行手术,23名有显著听力损失、明确症状或两者皆有的受试者被随机分配接受鼓膜切开术或鼓膜切开术加置管。与单独进行鼓膜切开术或不进行手术相比,鼓膜切开术加置管提供了更多的无病时间和更好的听力;然而,一些接受鼓膜切开术加置管的受试者出现了耳漏或鼓膜持续穿孔。在中耳积液时间百分比、急性中耳炎发作次数和后续手术次数方面,鼓膜切开术与不进行手术相比没有优势。这些结果可能不适用于病情较轻的儿童。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验