Suppr超能文献

ImpRess:一份使用对评估痴呆症认知刺激的随机对照试验进行系统评价而制定的实施准备情况检查表。

ImpRess: an Implementation Readiness checklist developed using a systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing cognitive stimulation for dementia.

作者信息

Streater Amy, Spector Aimee, Aguirre Elisa, Stansfeld Jacki, Orrell Martin

机构信息

North East London Foundation Trust, London, UK.

University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0268-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research reporting results of clinical trials, psychosocial or technological interventions frequently omit critical details needed to inform implementation in practice. The aim of this article is to develop an Implementation Readiness (ImpRess) checklist, that includes criteria deemed useful in measuring readiness for implementation and apply it to trials of cognitive stimulation in dementia, providing a systematic review of their readiness for widespread implementation.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched. After initial screening of papers, two reviewers assessed quality and scored the included studies based on the ImpRess checklist specifically developed for this review.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. As determined by the ImpRess checklist, scores ranged from 11 to 29 out of 52. According to the checklist the most comprehensive and ready to implement version of cognitive stimulation was Cognitive Stimulation Therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Reports of interventions rarely include consideration of implementation in practice. Contrary to the growing number of reporting guidelines, crucial items within the ImpRess checklist have been frequently overlooked. This study was able to show that the ImpRess checklist was feasible in practice and reliable. The checklist may be useful in evaluating readiness for implementation for other manualised interventions.

摘要

背景

报告临床试验、心理社会或技术干预结果的研究常常遗漏在实践中指导实施所需的关键细节。本文旨在制定一份实施准备情况(ImpRess)清单,其中包括被认为对衡量实施准备情况有用的标准,并将其应用于痴呆症认知刺激试验,对其广泛实施的准备情况进行系统评价。

方法

检索了五个电子数据库。在对论文进行初步筛选后,两名评审员根据专门为本综述制定的ImpRess清单评估质量并对纳入研究进行评分。

结果

20项研究符合纳入标准。根据ImpRess清单确定,得分在52分中从11分到29分不等。根据该清单,最全面且最易于实施的认知刺激版本是认知刺激疗法。

结论

干预报告很少包括对实践中实施情况的考虑。与越来越多的报告指南相反,ImpRess清单中的关键项目经常被忽视。本研究能够表明ImpRess清单在实践中是可行且可靠的。该清单可能有助于评估其他标准化干预措施的实施准备情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b9/5131468/b2a564fea27e/12874_2016_268_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验