Suppr超能文献

跨专业协作能力新测量量表的开发:千叶跨专业能力量表(CICS29)。

Development of a new measurement scale for interprofessional collaborative competency: The Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29).

作者信息

Sakai Ikuko, Yamamoto Takeshi, Takahashi Yoshinori, Maeda Takashi, Kunii Yuuko, Kurokochi Kana

机构信息

a Graduate School of Nursing , Chiba University , Chiba , Japan.

b Faculty of Health Science , Sapporo Medical University , Sapporo , Japan.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2017 Jan;31(1):59-65. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1233943. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to refine the items on a scale measuring interprofessional collaborative competency that was developed by the authors in an earlier pilot study. A questionnaire-based study was conducted with a sample of 2133 health professionals using the reformulated questionnaire. Construct validity was tested by comparing the survey results with a covariance structure analysis and the domains of interprofessional collaboration competencies presented in previous studies. A second survey was conducted 2 weeks later with a sample of 571 nursing professionals, using the same survey form to test its reliability. We constructed a model comprising 29 observed variables and six latent variables (the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale: CICS29), and obtained the following values for the model's goodness of fit: GFI = 0.925, AGFI = 0.908, CFI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.049. With regard to reliability, we obtained scores ranging from 0.65 to 0.77 for the intraclass correlation coefficients of the six domains. Compared with the interprofessional collaboration scales indicated in previous studies, the CICS29 was found to have subsumed the key concepts that should be configured as interprofessional collaboration competencies. The CICS29 appeared to have satisfactory levels of reliability and validity and is recommended as a scale for measuring competencies of interprofessional practice.

摘要

本研究的目的是对作者在早期初步研究中开发的跨专业协作能力量表的项目进行优化。使用重新制定的问卷,对2133名卫生专业人员进行了基于问卷的研究。通过将调查结果与协方差结构分析以及先前研究中提出的跨专业协作能力领域进行比较,检验了结构效度。两周后,对571名护理专业人员进行了第二次调查,使用相同的调查问卷来测试其信度。我们构建了一个包含29个观测变量和6个潜在变量的模型(千叶跨专业能力量表:CICS29),并获得了该模型拟合优度的以下值:GFI = 0.925,AGFI = 0.908,CFI = 0.950,RMSEA = 0.049。关于信度,六个领域的组内相关系数得分在0.65至0.77之间。与先前研究中指出的跨专业协作量表相比,发现CICS29涵盖了应被配置为跨专业协作能力的关键概念。CICS29似乎具有令人满意的信度和效度水平,建议作为衡量跨专业实践能力的量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验