Devlin Rebecca, Gupta Vikas
The Elizabeth and Tony Comper Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016 Dec 2;2016(1):543-551. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.543.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapeutic modality for myelofibrosis (MF) at present. The optimal timing of HCT is not known in the presence of wider availability of less risky nontransplant therapies such as JAK 1/2 inhibitors. Careful review of patient, disease, and transplant-related factors is required in the appropriate selection of HCT vs the best available nontransplant therapies. We highlight some of the relevant issues and positioning of HCT in light of evolving data on JAK 1/2 inhibitors. The goal of this study is to provide the reader with updated evidence of HCT for MF, recognizing that knowledge in this area is limited by the absence of comparative studies between HCT and nontransplant therapies. Prospective studies are needed for better information on: the determination of optimal timing and conditioning regimens, the best way to integrate JAK inhibitors in the HCT protocols, and the impact of JAK inhibitors on graft-versus-host disease.
造血细胞移植(HCT)是目前骨髓纤维化(MF)唯一的治愈性治疗方式。在JAK 1/2抑制剂等风险较低的非移植疗法可用性更高的情况下,HCT的最佳时机尚不清楚。在适当选择HCT与最佳可用非移植疗法时,需要仔细评估患者、疾病和移植相关因素。鉴于JAK 1/2抑制剂的最新数据,我们强调了一些相关问题以及HCT的定位。本研究的目的是为读者提供MF患者HCT的最新证据,同时认识到该领域的知识因缺乏HCT与非移植疗法的比较研究而受到限制。需要进行前瞻性研究,以更好地了解以下方面的信息:确定最佳时机和预处理方案、在HCT方案中整合JAK抑制剂的最佳方法,以及JAK抑制剂对移植物抗宿主病的影响。