Eriksen Christian Skou, Garde Ellen, Reislev Nina Linde, Wimmelmann Cathrine Lawaetz, Bieler Theresa, Ziegler Andreas Kraag, Gylling Anne Theil, Dideriksen Kasper Juel, Siebner Hartwig Roman, Mortensen Erik Lykke, Kjaer Michael
Department of Orthopedic Surgery M, Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Demark.
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 2;6(12):e012951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012951.
Physical and cognitive function decline with age, accelerating during the 6th decade. Loss of muscle power (force×velocity product) is a dominant physical determinant for loss of functional ability, especially if the lower extremities are affected. Muscle strength training is known to maintain or even improve muscle power as well as physical function in older adults, but the optimal type of training for beneficial long-term training effects over several years is unknown. Moreover, the impact of muscle strength training on cognitive function and brain structure remains speculative. The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of two different 1 year strength training regimens on immediate and long-lasting improvements in muscle power in retirement-age individuals. Secondary aims are to evaluate the effect on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical and cognitive function, mental well-being, health-related quality of life and brain morphology.
The study includes 450 home-dwelling men and women (62-70 years). Participants are randomly allocated to (1) 1 year of supervised, centre-based heavy resistance training, (2) home-based moderate intensity resistance training or (3) habitual physical activity (control). Changes in primary (leg extensor power) and secondary outcomes are analysed according to the intention to treat principle and per protocol at 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10 years.
The study is expected to generate new insights into training-induced promotion of functional ability and independency after retirement and will help to formulate national recommendations regarding physical activity schemes for the growing population of older individuals in western societies. Results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals, in PhD theses and at public meetings. The study is approved by the Regional Ethical Committee (Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark, number H-3-2014-017).
NCT02123641.
身体和认知功能会随着年龄的增长而衰退,在60多岁时加速衰退。肌肉力量(力量×速度乘积)的丧失是功能能力丧失的一个主要身体决定因素,尤其是当下肢受到影响时。众所周知,肌肉力量训练可以维持甚至改善老年人的肌肉力量以及身体功能,但多年来产生有益长期训练效果的最佳训练类型尚不清楚。此外,肌肉力量训练对认知功能和脑结构的影响仍具有推测性。这项随机对照试验的主要目的是比较两种不同的为期1年的力量训练方案对退休年龄个体肌肉力量即时和长期改善的效果。次要目的是评估对肌肉力量、肌肉质量、身体和认知功能、心理健康、健康相关生活质量和脑形态的影响。
该研究包括450名居家男女(62 - 70岁)。参与者被随机分配到:(1)为期1年的在监督下的、以中心为基础的大强度阻力训练;(2)居家中等强度阻力训练;或(3)习惯性体育活动(对照组)。根据意向性分析原则和符合方案分析,在1、2、4、7和10年时分析主要(腿部伸肌力量)和次要结局的变化。
该研究有望为退休后训练诱导的功能能力提升和独立性产生新的见解,并将有助于为西方社会日益增长的老年人群体制定有关体育活动计划的国家建议。研究结果将发表在科学同行评审期刊、博士论文以及公开会议上。该研究已获得地区伦理委员会(丹麦哥本哈根首都地区,编号H - 3 - 2014 - 017)的批准。
NCT02123641。