Chersich M F, Luchters S, Blaauw D, Scorgie F, Kern E, Van den Heever A, Rees H, Peach E, Kharadi S, Fonn S
Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2016 Dec 1;106(12):1192-1210. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106.i12.12011.
Deprivation during pregnancy and the neonatal period increases maternal morbidity, reduces birth weight and impairs child development, with lifelong consequences. Many poor countries provide grants to mitigate the impact of poverty during pregnancy. South Africa (SA) offers a post-delivery Child Support Grant (CSG), which could encompass support during pregnancy, informed by lessons learnt from similar grants.
To review design and operational features of pregnancy support programmes, highlighting features that promote their effectiveness and efficiency, and implications thereof for SA.
Systematic review of programmes providing cash or other support during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries.
Thirty-two programmes were identified, across 27 countries. Programmes aimed to influence health service utilisation, but also longer-term health and social outcomes. Half included conditionalities around service utilisation. Multifaceted support, such as cash and vouchers, necessitated complex parallel administrative procedures. Five included design features to diminish perverse incentives. These and other complex features were often abandoned over time. Operational barriers and administrative costs were lowest in programmes with simplified procedures and that were integrated within child support.
Pregnancy support in SA would be feasible and effective if integrated within existing social support programmes and operationally simple. This requires uncomplicated enrolment procedures (e.g. an antenatal card), cash-only support, and few or no conditionalities. To overcome political barriers to implementation, the design might initially need to include features that discourage pregnancy incentives. Support could incentivise service utilisation, without difficult-to-measure conditionalities. Beginning the CSG in pregnancy would be operationally simple and could substantially transform maternal and child health.
孕期和新生儿期的贫困会增加孕产妇发病率、降低出生体重并损害儿童发育,产生终身影响。许多贫穷国家提供补助金以减轻孕期贫困的影响。南非提供产后儿童抚养补助金(CSG),可借鉴类似补助金的经验,将孕期支持纳入其中。
回顾孕期支持项目的设计和运作特点,突出促进其有效性和效率的特点及其对南非的影响。
对低收入和中等收入国家在孕期提供现金或其他支持的项目进行系统回顾。
在27个国家共确定了32个项目。这些项目旨在影响卫生服务的利用情况,同时也关注长期的健康和社会结果。一半的项目包含与服务利用相关的条件。现金和代金券等多方面的支持需要复杂的并行行政程序。五个项目包含减少不良激励措施的设计特点。随着时间的推移,这些以及其他复杂的特点往往被摒弃。在程序简化且整合到儿童抚养体系中的项目中,操作障碍和行政成本最低。
如果将南非的孕期支持整合到现有的社会支持项目中且操作简单,将是可行且有效的。这需要简单的登记程序(如产前保健卡)、仅提供现金支持以及很少或没有附加条件。为克服实施过程中的政治障碍,设计可能最初需要包含一些减少对怀孕激励的特点。支持措施可以激励服务利用,而无需难以衡量的附加条件。在孕期开始发放儿童抚养补助金在操作上会很简单,并且可以大幅改善母婴健康。