Noguchi Tomoaki, Nishida Yuichi, Takizawa Keiji, Cui Yue, Tsutsumi Koki, Hamada Takashi, Nishi Yoshisuke
Graduate School of Bioscience, Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology, 1266 Tamura-cho, Nagahama, Shiga 526-0829, Japan.
Graduate School of Bioscience, Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology, 1266 Tamura-cho, Nagahama, Shiga 526-0829, Japan.
J Immunol Methods. 2017 Mar;442:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
Single domain antibody fragments from two species, a camel VH (PM1) and a shark V (A6), were derived from inclusion bodies of E. coli and refolded in vitro following three refolding recipes for comparing refolding efficiencies: three-step cold dialysis refolding (TCDR), one-step hot dialysis refolding (OHDR), and one-step cold dialysis refolding (OCDR), as these fragments were expressed as 'a soluble form' either in cytoplasm or periplasm, but the amount were much less than those expressed as 'an insoluble form (inclusion body)' in cytoplasm and periplasm. In order to verify the refolding efficiencies from inclusion bodies correctly, proteins purified from periplasmic soluble fractions were used as reference samples. These samples showed far-UV spectra of a typical β-sheet-dominant structure in circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and so did the refolded samples as well. As the maximal magnitude of ellipticity in millidegrees (θ) observed at a given wave length was proportional to the concentrations of the respective reference samples, we could draw linear regression lines for the magnitudes vs. sample concentrations. By using these lines, we measured the concentrations for the refolded PM1 and A6 samples purified from solubilized cytoplasmic insoluble fractions. The refolding efficiency of PM1 was almost 50% following TCDR and 40% and 30% following OHDR and OCDR, respectively, whereas the value of A6 was around 30% following TCDR, and out of bound for quantitation following the other two recipes. The ELISA curves, which were derived from the refolded samples, coincided better with those obtained from the reference samples after converting the values from the protein-concentrations at recovery to the ones of refolded proteins using recovery ratios, indicating that such a correction gives better results for the accurate measure of the ELISA curves than those without correction. Our method require constructing a dual expression system, expressed both in periplasm as a soluble form and cytoplasm as an insoluble form; application of the different refolding recipes due to sequence-by-sequence-difference could be precisely monitored using CD spectra with the concomitant soluble samples as a reference.
从两种物种中获得的单域抗体片段,即骆驼重链可变区(PM1)和鲨鱼可变区(A6),来源于大肠杆菌的包涵体,并按照三种复性方案在体外进行复性,以比较复性效率:三步冷透析复性(TCDR)、一步热透析复性(OHDR)和一步冷透析复性(OCDR)。因为这些片段在细胞质或周质中以“可溶性形式”表达,但表达量远低于在细胞质和周质中以“不溶性形式(包涵体)”表达的量。为了正确验证从包涵体的复性效率,将从周质可溶性组分中纯化的蛋白质用作参考样品。这些样品在圆二色性(CD)光谱中显示出典型的以β-折叠为主的结构的远紫外光谱,复性后的样品也是如此。由于在给定波长处观察到的以毫度(θ)为单位的椭圆率的最大幅度与各自参考样品的浓度成正比,我们可以绘制幅度与样品浓度的线性回归线。通过使用这些线,我们测量了从溶解的细胞质不溶性组分中纯化的复性PM1和A6样品的浓度。PM1在TCDR后的复性效率约为50%,在OHDR和OCDR后分别为40%和30%,而A6在TCDR后的复性效率约为30%,在其他两种方案下无法定量。将复性样品的值从回收率时的蛋白质浓度转换为复性蛋白质的浓度后,复性样品得到的ELISA曲线与参考样品得到的曲线更吻合,这表明这种校正比未校正的情况能更好地准确测量ELISA曲线。我们的方法需要构建一个双表达系统,在周质中以可溶性形式表达,在细胞质中以不溶性形式表达;由于序列差异而应用不同的复性方案可以通过以伴随的可溶性样品为参考的CD光谱进行精确监测。