Dhulkhed Vithal Krishna, Kurdi Madhuri S, Dhulkhed Pavan V, Ramaswamy Ashwini H
Department of Anaesthesiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;60(11):796-800. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.193657.
Research publications are desirable for academic promotion in medical colleges as per the current rules of the Medical Council of India (MCI). These rules reflect an endeavour to improve the academic standards. We strongly believe that every medical college teacher should conduct true research and contribute to good peer-reviewed publications. However, it is felt that the MCI rule has the potential to lead to undesirable consequences, and the quality of teaching and learning could take a back-seat. There is an urgent need to adopt more objective criteria and better guidelines as followed by well-known global institutes. In our own country, the University Grants Commission has formulated specific guidelines for this purpose in the form of Academic Performance Indicators which, it appears, are not taken into consideration by the MCI. This article discusses the adverse impact of the rule and suggests ways for the adoption of a more scientific assessment system for faculty appointment and promotion.
根据印度医学委员会(MCI)的现行规定,研究出版物对于医学院校的学术晋升是必要的。这些规定反映了提高学术水平的努力。我们坚信,每一位医学院教师都应该进行真正的研究,并为优秀的同行评审出版物做出贡献。然而,有人认为MCI的规定有可能导致不良后果,教学质量可能会被置于次要地位。迫切需要采用更客观的标准和知名全球机构所遵循的更好的指导方针。在我们自己的国家,大学资助委员会已经为此制定了具体的指导方针,即学术表现指标,但MCI似乎并未予以考虑。本文讨论了该规定的不利影响,并提出了采用更科学的评估体系进行教师聘任和晋升的方法。