Torgrud L J, Holborn S W
Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):181-91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-181.
Two kinds of mediating behavior were compared with respect to their effectiveness in variable-delay matching-to-sample and oddity-matching tasks. Each of four 5-year-old children was trained to emit either differential or common mediating responses. The differential mediating response consisted of pressing a specific computer key corresponding to either of two possible sample stimuli (a red or a green square). The common mediating response consisted of pressing one of the two response keys regardless of the sample. The differential-response subjects did not show the typical, delay-related decrease in matching-to-sample performance that characterized the behavior of common-response subjects. An oddity-matching task was then introduced, and subjects were instructed to use the mediating keys however they preferred, including not at all. Differential-response subjects continued to respond on the originally trained mediating keys in response to sample presentation and later reversed their choice responding, thus accommodating the oddity-matching requirements. Common-response subjects continued to emit the previously trained mediating response and experienced limited success in oddity matching. Results were interpreted in terms of stimulus control, instructional control, and experimental history.
在可变延迟样本匹配和奇异性匹配任务中,对两种中介行为的有效性进行了比较。四名5岁儿童中的每一名都被训练发出差异或共同的中介反应。差异中介反应包括按下与两种可能的样本刺激(红色或绿色方块)之一相对应的特定计算机按键。共同中介反应包括无论样本如何都按下两个反应键之一。差异反应的受试者没有表现出样本匹配表现中典型的、与延迟相关的下降,而这种下降是共同反应受试者行为的特征。然后引入了奇异性匹配任务,并指示受试者以他们喜欢的任何方式使用中介键,包括根本不使用。差异反应的受试者在样本呈现时继续在最初训练的中介键上做出反应,后来改变了他们的选择反应,从而适应了奇异性匹配要求。共同反应的受试者继续发出先前训练的中介反应,并且在奇异性匹配中取得的成功有限。结果从刺激控制、指令控制和实验历史的角度进行了解释。